Abstract
Close contacts between individuals provide opportunities for the transmission of diseases, including COVID-19. Individuals take part in many different types of interactions, including those with classmates, co-workers, and household members; the conglomeration of all of these interactions produces a complex social contact network interconnecting individuals across the population. Thus, while an individual might decide their own risk tolerance in response to a threat of infection, the consequences of such decisions are rarely so confined, propagating far beyond any one person. We asses the effect of different population-level risk-tolerance regimes, population structure in the form of age and household-size distributions, and different types of interactions on epidemic spread in plausible human contact networks to gain insight into how contact network structure affects pathogen spread through a population. In particular, we find that changes in behaviour of vulnerable individuals in isolation is insufficient to reduce those individuals’ infection risk, that population structure can have varied and counter-acting effects on epidemic outcomes, and that, in general, interactions among co-workers have a greater contribution to disease spread than do interactions among children at school. Taken together, these results promote a nuanced understanding of disease spread on contact networks, with implications for public health strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [DEB 1654609 and 2030509], a University of Minnesota Office of Academic Clinical Affairs COVID-19 Rapid Response Grant, the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health [NIH T32OD010993], the University of Minnesota Informatics Institute Mn-DRIVE program, the Van Sloun Foundation, and by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation [DBI 1639145]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
