Abstract
Introduction Obesity is a major threat to global health. When more conventional methods have failed, obesity can be addressed via bariatric surgery. Here we examine the reasons why patients choose bariatric surgery and the behavioral consequences thereafter.
Methods A qualitative study with a phenomenological design was used to analyze detailed interview responses from recipients of bariatric surgery.
Results Before surgery, (a) bariatric surgery was chosen for obvious reasons: patients had been overweight, had obesity-related health problems, and had difficulties moving. (b) Information was obtained from medical practitioners and online discussion groups. (c) Fear, anxiety, and apprehension were common. Friends and family were sometimes supportive and sometimes disapproving. After surgery, (1) many chronic health problems disappeared or eased significantly. (2) Subjects had difficulties adjusting to small portions and altered food preferences. (3) Physical activity increased. (4) Self-esteem increased but the worry of regaining the weight remained. (5) As before surgery, there were both supportive and condemning attitudes by relatives, friends, and society. (6) A desire for further nutritional and psychological counseling was indicated. (7) Relationships and quality of sex improved in most cases but not always. Single women, particularly, became more active in potential relationships.
Discussion With a few exceptions, our results agree with the literature, supporting the idea that bariatric surgery leads to extensive physical, psychological, and social changes. Hence, patients ought to be better prepared for these changes, and medical practitioners ought to be aware of the magnitude of the changes this surgery will bring about in their patients’ lives.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Tartu University human research ethics committee (protocol number 294/T-26).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email liislozano{at}kliinikum.ee
Email triin.poder7{at}gmail.com
↵* Tel +37255633099. dr.george.lozano{at}gmail.com
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.