Abstract
Background Dementia is associated with frailty leading to increased risks of falls and hospitalisations. Interventions are required to maintain functional ability, strength and balance.
Design Multi-centre parallel group randomised controlled trial, with embedded process evaluation. Procedures were adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants People with mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), living at home, and a family member or carer.
Objectives To determine the effectiveness of an exercise and functional activity therapy intervention compared to usual care.
Intervention A specially-designed dementia-specific rehabilitation programme focussing on strength, balance, physical activity and performance of ADL, which was tailored, progressive, addressed risk and the psychological and learning needs of people with dementia, providing up to 50 therapy sessions over 12 months. The control group received usual care plus a falls risk assessment.
Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the informant-reported Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were: self-reported ADL, cognition, physical activity, quality of life, frailty, balance, functional mobility, fear of falling, mood, carer strain and service use (at 12 months) and falls (between months 4 and 15).
Results 365 people were randomised, 183 to intervention and 182 to control. Median age of participants was 80 years (range 65-95), median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score 20/30 (range 13-26), 58% were men. Participants received a median of 31 (IQR = 22-40) therapy sessions out of a possible maximum of 50. Participants reported completing a mean 121 minutes/week of PrAISED activity outside of supervised sessions. Primary outcome data were available for 149 (intervention) and 141 (control) participants. There was no difference in DAD scores between groups: adjusted mean difference -1.3/100, 95% Confidence Interval (−5.2 to +2.6); Cohen’s d effect size -0.06 (−0.26 to +0.15); p=0.5. Upper 95% confidence intervals excluded small to moderate effects on any of the range of secondary outcome measures. Between months 4 and 15 there were 79 falls in the intervention group and 200 falls in the control group, adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.78 (0.5 to 1.3); p= 0.3.
Conclusion The intensive PrAISED programme of exercise and functional activity training did not improve ADLs, physical activity, quality of life, reduce falls or improve any other secondary health status outcomes even though uptake was good. Future research should consider alternative approaches to risk reduction and ability maintenance.
Trial registration ISRCTN15320670.
Funding National Institute for Health and Care Research
What is already known
Dementia is associated with progressive loss of functional ability, including activities of daily living and mobility, and a high risk of falls
Exercise programmes and rehabilitation therapies may improve ability, or slow the rate of decline, but evidence from trials and systematic reviews is equivocal
What this study tells us
We developed an intensive dementia-specific exercise and functional activity rehabilitation programme, lasting 12 months, taking account of motivation, learning needs and context, in particular the need to engage carers, and evaluated it in a randomised controlled trial
The programme was very well received by participants and therapists, but had no effect on activities of daily living, physical activity, quality of life, falls, cognition or any other health status outcome
We are unlikely to be able to change rate of loss of ability in dementia through exercise or functionally orientated rehabilitation therapy.
We need different ways of defining wellbeing after a dementia diagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN15320670
Clinical Protocols
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-019-3871-9
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Health Research, award number RP-PG-0614-20007. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Bradford-Leeds Research Ethics Committee (REC number 18/YH/0059, IRAS project identification 236099) and research governance departments in each participating organisation.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Sarah.goldberg{at}nottingham.ac.uk
a.brand{at}bangor.ac.uk
v.vanderwardt{at}uni-marburg.de
Victoria.booth{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Claudio.dilorito{at}nottingham.ac.uk
z.hoare{at}bangor.ac.uk
j.hancox{at}lboro.ac.uk
Rupinder.bajwa{at}nottingham.ac.uk
clare.burgon{at}nottingham.ac.uk
louise.howe{at}nottingham.ac.uk
alison.cowley{at}nottingham.ac.uk
trevor.bramley{at}nottshc.nhs.uk
Annabelle.Long1{at}nottingham.ac.uk
juliette.lock{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Rachael.Tucker1{at}nottingham.ac.uk
emma.adams{at}nottingham.ac.uk
rebecca.obrien{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Fiona.kearney{at}nuh.nhs.uk
katarzyna.kowalewska{at}nottingham.ac.uk
maureengodfrey47{at}gmail.com
mariannedunlop{at}icloud.com
Kehinde.junaid{at}nottshc.nhs.uk
simon.thacker{at}nhs.net
carol.duff3{at}nhs.net
tomas.welsh{at}nhs.net
annette.haddon-silver{at}oxfordhealth.nhs.uk
john.gladman{at}nottingham.ac.uk
pip.logan{at}nottingham.ac.uk
kristian.pollock{at}nottingham.ac.uk
kavita.vedhara{at}nottingham.ac.uk
vicky_hood{at}hotmail.com
roshan.nair{at}sintef.no
helen.smith{at}nottshc.nhs.uk
r.t.edwards{at}bangor.ac.uk
ned.hartfiel{at}bangor.ac.uk
v.ezeofor{at}bangor.ac.uk
Robert.vickers{at}nottingham.ac.uk
m.orrell{at}nottingham.ac.uk
tahir.masud{at}nuh.nhs.uk
The corresponding author is guarantor.
The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
one author email address corrected (Dr van der Wardt) Process evaluation MedRxiv doi added (reference 80)
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors