Abstract
Objectives To examine to what extent pre-payment meters (PPMs) are associated with multiple measures of structural economic and health deprivation.
Design Cross-sectional, observational.
Setting England and Wales.
Data source Experimental Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA) prepayment electricity meter consumption 2017 is used to map the percentage of PPMs for each LSOA. Number of domestic prepayment meters and meters for 33,332 LSOA regions across England and Wales are linked with multiple sub-national LSOA deprivation and Middle Layer Super Output Area (MSOA) health measures. Smart meters operating in prepayment mode are not included.
Outcome measures Prevalence of PPMs for electricity bills per LSOA, associated with multiple national deprivation measures. In England: fuel poverty; income deprivation children and older people; living environment; barriers to housing and services; crime; health and disability; education, skills and training; employment; income; overall Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). In Wales: physical environment; community safety; housing; access to services; education; health; employment; income; overall Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD). Additional outcomes of Tenure Type of Housing (rented social, private; owned) and emergency hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (England) and all respiratory diseases (Wales).
Results PPM prevalence is strongly correlated (0.62 to 0.63) with fuel poverty, with similar patterns in England and Wales. In England, PPM prevalence was strongly associated with virtually all deprivation indicators, including: lower income (−0.83 [−0.83 to −0.82]), receipt of employment-related benefits (−0.76 [−0.77 to −0.76]), educational disadvantage (−0.70 [−0.70 to −0.69]) and higher levels of health deprivation (−0.65 [−0.65 to −0.63]). Higher PPM prevalence is concentrated in low-income families with children and older individuals, strongly associated with income deprivation affecting children (−0.8 [−0.81 to −0.80]) and older people (−0.79 [−0.80 to −0.79]), social rent (0.67 [0.66 to 0.68]), hospital admissions for respiratory diseases (England 0.69 [0.68 to 0.70]; Wales 0.64 [0.58 to 0.70]), indicating a heightened risk of illness.
Conclusions Instead of blanket policies, interventions on households with PPMs offers an immediate solution to avoid a health crisis and shield vulnerable households from a ‘heat or eat’ dilemma and further exacerbating existing inequalities.
Strengths and limitations of the study This is the first analysis linking structural economic and health inequality to pre-payment meters (PPM) in the current energy crisis.
PPMs are a similar to standard measures of fuel poverty, but a more straightforward proxy for a rapid targeted intervention to avoid a surge in hospital emergency admissions this winter as the most vulnerable households face a ‘heat or eat’ dilemma.
PPMs are concentrated in vulnerable households (children, elderly, out of employment) and highly correlated with socioeconomic deprivation and emergency hospital admissions for respiratory diseases.
PPMs do not include smart meters operating in prepayment mode, underrepresenting the observed level of poverty.
The study includes only England and Wales. Care should be taken when generalising to other areas. We call for the release of PPM data in Scotland and Northern Ireland, to include payment methods in social surveys to evaluate risk for focused interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MCM and all researchers are supported by an ERC Advanced Grant CHRONO (957566); the Leverhulme Trust Large Centre Grant for the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science and the ESRC/UKRI Connecting Generations Centre (ES/Vo14188/1). KD is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council grant ES/P000649/1.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
The methods section is updated to clarify the sample; Figure 4 revised; Supplemental files updated.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
