Abstract
Background Women of reproductive age (WIFA, 15-49 years) in Ghana are experiencing an upsurge in excess body mass index (BMI) and anemia (low hemoglobin concentration (Hb of ≤ 10.9 g/dl)). Regions of Southern Ghana (Central, Eastern, and Volta) are recognized to have high rates of adolescent pregnancies, and is known to be associated with high risk of anemia. However, little is known for pregnant South Ghanaian women. This study aimed to examine anthropometry – maternal stature and early pregnancy BMI – and socio-demographic measures as independent risk factors for anemia in antenatal women in Southern Ghana.
Methodology Baseline data on anemia from healthy pregnant women (15-49 years; n = 1278) collected through antenatal attendance in an observational cohort study was included in the descriptive and logistic regression analysis using STATA (Stata Corp LLC [US]). Anemia (dependent) and the independent variables: high parity (≥5 children/woman); short stature (145≤155cm); underweight (BMI <18.5kg/m2), normal (BMI 18.5-24.9kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-29.9kg/m2), and obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) assessed with weight (kg) before the 20th week of gestation divided by height (m2) were defined following standards. Wealth status was constructed using Principal Component Analysis of durable assets, housing characteristics, water/sanitation, and toilets facilities. All estimates were evaluated at the 5% significance level (p < 0.05).
Results Of the sample, 45.85% had moderate/severe anemia with 9.67(±0.04) average hemoglobin (g/dl) concentration. Overweight/obesity was approximately (47%; overweight 29% vs obesity 18%), short stature (4.77%), and underweight (4.61%) in the 1278 women interviewed. Obesity was highest in the highest income women (26.24% (69/263)) in whom anemia decreased (34.78%, 80/230)) compared to highest prevalence of anemia in short stature (59.01%, 36/61), underweight (57.62%, 34/59), and overweight (44.68%, 164/367) women.
The risk of anemia increased with high parity (adjusted odds ratio; aOR 3.91; 95%CI: 1.79-8.52; p = 0.001); lowest income quintile (aOR:2.10; 95%CI: 1.35-3.26; p = 0.001); second income quintile (aOR:1.52; 95%CI: 1.01-2.30 p = 0.045); being Ewe ethnicity (aOR:2.09; 95%CI: 1.35-3.24; p = 0.001); and Akan (aOR:1.79; 95%CI: 1.16-2.74; p = 0.008); while obesity reduced the risk (aOR:0.70; 95%CI: 0.50-0.99; p = 0.045).
Conclusion Anemia in pregnancy and overweight, and obesity as double burden of malnutrition remain significantly high in pregnant South Ghanaian women. The AIP exceeded the WHO defined threshold and was particularly highest in women having high parity, short stature, and underweight. While high parity and income status increased overweight/obesity, obese women were more likely to have a reduced risk of anemia. However, across the ethnicity, high parity and low-income status posed significant risk of anemia in women. Further research examining the nexus between underweight or short stature versus high rates of anemia or overweight/obesity and income and anemia to better explain, and prevent the increasing trend of anemia in pregnant Ghanaian women is recommended.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Health and Allied Science, Ghana, with the reference number UHAS-REC A.2 [7], 18-19. Each selected health facility granted written permission for use of the study site. Each eligible woman who willingly volunteered to be involved provided written informed consent for enrollment after understanding the study details including potential benefits and harm, data collection procedures, data storage and protection, and anonymity as spelt out in the participants information sheet.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
