ABSTRACT
Background One of the main challenges for the mass introduction of molecular diagnostics of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) into clinical practice is the lack of a generally recognized effective method for isolating parasitic DNA from fecal samples. In the present study, we assessed the effect of various pretreatment procedures on the efficiency of removing PCR inhibitors and extracting Toxocara canis DNA from feces.
Methodology and main results In the first part of the work, we evaluated the effectiveness of four destructive methods (bead beating, the action of temperature-dependent enzymes, freeze-heat cycles, and incubation in a lysis buffer of a commercial kit) on the integrity of Toxocara eggs using microscopy and the efficiency of DNA extraction using PCR. Our results showed that Toxocara eggs were most effectively destroyed using the bead beating procedure, while the effect of enzymes and freeze-heat cycles did not lead to significant destruction of the eggs or the release of Toxocara DNA. In the second part of the work, we evaluated the effect of prewashes with 0.1% Tween-20 solution and the use of commercial concentrators on DNA extraction from fecal samples contaminated with T. canis eggs. We have shown that the use of commercial concentrators in combination with sample washing can significantly increase the DNA yield and reduce PCR inhibition.
Conclusions A bead beating procedure for 30 minutes at a shaking frequency of 50 Hz was sufficient to completely destroy the Toxocara canis eggs. Helminth DNA isolation protocols that do not include a bead beating step are not preferred. The use of a commercial concentrator followed by washing with a 0.1% Tween-20 solution can significantly increase the yield of STHs DNA and reduce PCR inhibition.
AUTHOR SUMMARY DNA-based techniques are increasingly being used for the diagnosis of intestinal helminth infections in both clinical and research laboratories. However, extracting DNA from intestinal worm eggs in feces remains a challenge because the very tough eggshell protects their DNA. In addition, feces contain inhibitors that can interfere with test results, and these must be removed during DNA extraction. In the present study, we assessed the effect of different STHs egg destruction methods, as well as concentration and washing procedures for fecal samples, on the PCR test results. We have shown that bead beating is the most effective and sufficient method for the complete destruction of helminth eggs. In addition, we have shown that parasite concentrators significantly increase the sensitivity of the PCR-based test.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical Committee of the G. N. Speransky Children's City Clinical Hospital No. 9, Moscow Department of Health. Lead organization: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data is deposited in Open Science Framework (URL: https://osf.io/2ruyt/)
