Abstract
Objective To compare forward head posture (FHP) in natural and corrected head postures between patients with nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) and controls, and to clarify the relationship between natural- and corrected-head posture angle differences and deep cervical flexor function.
Design Survey study
Setting Patients with NSNP were outpatients at an orthopedic clinic; the controls were community volunteers.
Participants Thirty-eight patients were divided into the NSNP and control groups (n=19 each), including patients reporting a numerical rating pain score of 3-7 for at least 3 months and those with no neck pain within 12 months previously, respectively.
Interventions To evaluate FHP, the cranial rotation and vertical angles were measured using lateral photographs of the head and neck. The craniocervical flexion test was used to evaluate deep cervical flexor activation and endurance.
Main outcome measures We evaluated the head and neck alignment in natural and corrected head postures and the relationship between the degree of change and deep cervical flexor function.
Results The FHP in the natural head posture did not differ significantly between the groups. For corrected head posture, the FHP was significantly smaller in the NSNP group than in the control group. In the NSNP group, the cranial rotation and vertical angles were significantly different between natural and corrected head postures, and the angle difference between these postures was significantly correlated with deep cervical flexor function.
Conclusions In patients with NSNP, hypercorrection in the corrected head posture was shown and may be correlated with dysfunction of the deep cervical flexors. Further investigation into the causal relationship between hypercorrection, deep neck flexor dysfunction, and neck pain is required.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Tokyo Medical and Dental University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
List of Abbreviations
- BMI
- body mass index
- CCFT
- craniocervical flexion test
- CRA
- cranial rotation angle
- CVA
- cranial vertical angle
- FHP
- forward head posture
- ICC
- intraclass correlation coefficient
- NRS
- numerical rating scale
- NSNP
- nonspecific neck pain
- PI
- performance index
