Abstract
Background Ventriculoperitoneal shunting improves gait in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Postural instability is a major concern, but mostly ignored in the evaluation and treatment of these patients. This study quantified postural instability using kinematics via a prospective cohort design.
Methods Seventeen patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus and twenty age-matched, healthy controls underwent quantitative pull test and gait examinations while wearing inertial measurement units at baseline. Patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus who were shunted (n=13) and not shunted (n=4) underwent further testing after a lumbar drain trial and at follow-up visits 6 and 12 months post-operatively.
Results While most gait improvement in patients who were shunted was seen immediately after the lumbar drain trial, measures of their postural response continued to improve after the lumbar drain trial through one year of follow-up. Patients who were not shunted showed no statistically significant changes in gait and postural instability measures.
Conclusions After shunting, postural instability improves continuously over one year. In contrast, a large improvement in gait is seen immediately with minimal change over the subsequent year. This difference in timing may implicate two distinct neurophysiological mechanisms of recovery and provides novel evidence that postural instability improves in response to long-term CSF diversion.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by MnDRIVE, a collaboration between the state of Minnesota and the University of Minnesota.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Minneapolis Veterans Administration Health Care System IRB & University of Minnesota IRB both gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
