Abstract
Introduction There is paucity of data examining disparities in salary and representation for disabled scientists, which is needed to advance inclusion and equity for people with disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).
Methods Analyses used cross-sectional data from the 2019 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. We compared salaries between doctorate recipients with and without disabilities who were currently employed in STEM (N = 704,013), but who were otherwise similar on socioeconomic, degree and job-related characteristics, using propensity score weighting to carry out balanced comparisons, and further examined these differences in salary in the subset of doctorate recipients working in STEM at academic institutions (N = 219,413). In the subset of participants working in academia, we examined whether the representation of people with disabilities differed across categories of academic career milestones using chi-square tests (α = 0.05).
Results Doctorate recipients working in STEM with early onset disabilities (identified <25 years of age) earned $10,580 less per year than non-disabled workers, and in the subset of academic workers this difference was larger (-$14,360). Salaries appeared lower for people with late onset disabilities as compared to those without, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. We observed an underrepresentation of academics with disabilities at higher faculty ranks (p<0.0001), among Deans/Presidents (p<0.0001) and among those with tenure (p: 0.0004).
Conclusion These findings support a need to expand efforts to foster inclusion, provide equal opportunities for career advancement, and improve working conditions for people with disabilities in STEM.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version contains minor formatting changes
Data Availability
SDR 2019 public-use data are available at https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/datadownload/.
