Abstract
Obesity is a widespread health issue worldwide. Therefore, evaluating existing pharmaceuticals and developing new effective strategies to mitigate the problem is essential. Although literature reviews of a broad range of interventions for managing obesity exist, a recent evaluation of the efficacy of orlistat is lacking. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the efficacy of orlistat on body mass index (BMI) and the impact of age, dose, duration, and comorbidities. A literature search of orlistat on PubMed was carried out, and 177 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials published in the last twenty years were identified. Sixteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for further analysis. Two investigators independently extracted data from the clinical reports using a predefined protocol. We conducted a meta-analysis using random and mixed effects models with different moderators. We found that, on aggregate, the orlistat group reduced their BMI by 0.72 kg/m2 (P < 0.05) compared to the placebo group. In addition, a longer duration of intervention led to a greater decrease in BMI. Moreover, patients with comorbidities experienced a smaller change in BMI. In conclusion, the evidence suggests that orlistat moderately reduces BMI in obese subjects. The effect of lifestyle modifications, side effects, and drug interactions should be assessed in future studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of the Korea government [2020R1A2C2011416]. GJ and DH were part of a training program for medical students funded by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos