Abstract
Background Preterm births affect households’ incomes through direct and indirect expenditures associated with low productivity and the actual loss of employment in many cases. We studied the determinants of preterm birth in Uganda as one of the major contributors to neonatal morbidity and mortality, leading to households’ economic losses.
Methods We used a cross-sectional research design based on the most recent Uganda Demographic Health Survey of 2016. The sample contained 1,537 women aged 15-49 years. The variable selection process was guided by categorization of the variables into; socio-demographic, reproductive history, and gestational birth characteristics. The study adopted two means of analysis. The logistic regression model to determine variables of preterm birth between 22 – 36 weeks and normal delivery period. Then the multinomial logistic regression model to determine how two preterm birth categories (22 – 32 weeks and 33 – 36 weeks) relate with the normal delivery period.
Results Belonging to the poorest quintile (AOR2.09, 95% CI (1.69-2.57)) and attending antenatal care less than four times (AOR1.41, 95% CI (1.20-1.66)) had the highest odds ratios for the logistic regression model. Whereas the multinomial logistic regression model; for the 22-32 weeks category, belonging to the poorest quintile (RRR2.43, 95% CI(1.45-4.08)), attending antenatal care less than four times (RRR2.44, 95% CI (1.63-3.64)), had the highest relative risk ratios. For the 33-36 weeks category; belonging to a poorest quintile (RRR2.03, 95% CI (1.62-2.53)), having had less than four antenatal visits (RRR1.29, 95% CI (1.09-1.54)), and unwanted pregnancy (RRR1.22, 95% CI (1.03-1.45)), had the highest relative risk ratios.
Conclusion Attending antenatal care for less than four times and belonging to the poorest quintile are common risk factors related to preterm birth. We therefore recommend that these receive utmost attention from the policy makers and implementers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study did not require formal approval except for the authorization acquired to use the secondary survey data from the Demographic Health Survey (DHS) Program via http://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin/login_main.cfm.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is attached