Bivalent BNT162b2mRNA original/Omicron BA.4-5 booster vaccination: adverse reactions and inability to work compared to the monovalent COVID-19 booster
View ORCID ProfileIsabell Wagenhäuser, View ORCID ProfileJulia Reusch, View ORCID ProfileAlexander Gabel, View ORCID ProfileLukas B. Krone, View ORCID ProfileOliver Kurzai, View ORCID ProfileNils Petri, View ORCID ProfileManuel Krone
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.07.22281982
Isabell Wagenhäuser
1Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
Julia Reusch
2Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
Alexander Gabel
1Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
PhDLukas B. Krone
3Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
MD PhDOliver Kurzai
4Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
MDNils Petri
2Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
MDManuel Krone
1Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
MD, MScPHData Availability
Additional data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) as well as the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code is made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims in the approved proposal on request to the corresponding author.
Posted November 08, 2022.
Bivalent BNT162b2mRNA original/Omicron BA.4-5 booster vaccination: adverse reactions and inability to work compared to the monovalent COVID-19 booster
Isabell Wagenhäuser, Julia Reusch, Alexander Gabel, Lukas B. Krone, Oliver Kurzai, Nils Petri, Manuel Krone
medRxiv 2022.11.07.22281982; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.07.22281982
Bivalent BNT162b2mRNA original/Omicron BA.4-5 booster vaccination: adverse reactions and inability to work compared to the monovalent COVID-19 booster
Isabell Wagenhäuser, Julia Reusch, Alexander Gabel, Lukas B. Krone, Oliver Kurzai, Nils Petri, Manuel Krone
medRxiv 2022.11.07.22281982; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.07.22281982
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (400)
- Allergy and Immunology (711)
- Anesthesia (202)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (2954)
- Dermatology (250)
- Emergency Medicine (443)
- Epidemiology (12766)
- Forensic Medicine (12)
- Gastroenterology (829)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4600)
- Geriatric Medicine (420)
- Health Economics (731)
- Health Informatics (2934)
- Health Policy (1069)
- Hematology (389)
- HIV/AIDS (926)
- Medical Education (427)
- Medical Ethics (116)
- Nephrology (471)
- Neurology (4377)
- Nursing (237)
- Nutrition (640)
- Oncology (2277)
- Ophthalmology (648)
- Orthopedics (258)
- Otolaryngology (325)
- Pain Medicine (279)
- Palliative Medicine (83)
- Pathology (502)
- Pediatrics (1197)
- Primary Care Research (499)
- Public and Global Health (6963)
- Radiology and Imaging (1533)
- Respiratory Medicine (916)
- Rheumatology (441)
- Sports Medicine (385)
- Surgery (491)
- Toxicology (60)
- Transplantation (212)
- Urology (181)