Abstract
Rationale and objectives Breast cancer represents the leading cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Early detection of breast tumours improves the prognosis and survival rate. Propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography (PB-CT) is a technique that uses refraction and absorption of the X-ray to produce images for clinical applications. This study compared the performance of photon-counting and flat-panel X-ray detectors in PB-CT breast imaging using synchrotron radiation.
Materials and methods Mastectomy specimens underwent PB-CT imaging using the Hamamatsu C10900D Flat Panel and PIXIRAD-8 CdTe single-photon-counting detectors. PB-CT images generated at different imaging conditions were compared to absorption-based CT (AB-CT) reference images acquired with the same detectors to investigate the image quality improvement delivered by PB-CT relative to AB-CT. The image quality of the different image sets was assessed by eleven readers in a visual grading characteristics (VGC) study.
Results The intraclass correlation coefficient showed a moderate/good interobserver agreement for the image set analysed (ICC = 0.626, p = <0.001). The area under the curve showed that the image quality improvement in PB-CT images obtained by the PIXIRAD-8 CdTe single-photon-counting detector were consistently higher than the one for flat-panel Hamamatsu detector. The level of improvement in image quality was more substantial at lower radiation doses.
Conclusion In this study, the PIXIRAD-8 photon-counting detector was associated with higher image quality scores at all tested radiation dose levels, which was likely a result of the combined effect of the absence of dark current noise and better spatial resolution, compared to the flat-panel detector.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was received from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sydney (project number: CF15/3138-2015001340) for the scans performed at the imaging and medical beamline (IMBL). The scans at SYnchrotron Radiation for MEdical Physics (SYREMP) (Trieste, Italy) were performed according to the Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 31st 2004, on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage, and distribution of human tissues and cells and in the framework of the operative protocol of the Institutional Review Board of the Breast Unit of the Trieste University Hospital ("PDTA Neoplasia mammaria", ethical approval received on the 11th December 2019 by ASUGI-Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Italy). Written consent was obtained from patients.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
