ABSTRACT
Industrial livestock operations (ILOs), particularly processing facilities, emerged as centers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in spring 2020. Confirmed cases of COVID-19 underestimate true prevalence. To investigate prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, we enrolled 279 participants in North Carolina from February 2021 to July 2022: 90 from households with at least one ILO worker (ILO), 97 from high-ILO intensity areas (ILO neighbors – ILON), and 92 from metropolitan areas (Metro). Participants provided a saliva swab we analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 IgG using a multiplex immunoassay. Prevalence of infection-induced IgG (positive for nucleocapsid and receptor binding domain) was higher among ILO (63%) compared to ILON (42.9%) and Metro (48.7%) participants (prevalence ratio [PR] =1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.80; ref. ILON and Metro combined). Prevalence of infection-induced IgG was also higher among ILO participants compared to an Atlanta healthcare worker cohort (PR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.8, 3.3) and a general population cohort in North Carolina (PRs 6.37-10.67). Infection-induced IgG prevalence increased over the study period. Participants reporting not masking in public in the past two weeks had higher infection-induced IgG prevalence (78.6%) compared to participants reporting masking (49.3%) (PR=1.59; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.13). Lower education, more people per bedroom, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and more contact with people outside the home were also associated with higher infection-induced IgG prevalence. Similar proportions of ILO (51.6%), ILON (48.4%), and Metro (55.4%) participants completed the COVID-19 primary vaccination series; median completion was more than four months later for ILO compared to ILON and Metro participants.
Importance Few studies have measured COVID-19 seroprevalence in North Carolina, especially among rural, Black, and Hispanic/Latino communities that have been heavily affected. Antibody results show high rates of COVID-19 among industrial livestock operation workers and their household members. Antibody results add to evidence of health disparities in COVID-19 by socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Associations between masking and physical distancing with antibody results also add to evidence of the effectiveness of these prevention strategies. Delays in the timing of receipt of COVID-19 vaccination reinforce the importance of dismantling vaccination barriers, especially for industrial livestock operation workers and their household members.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by an anonymous gift, the JHU COVID-19 Research and Response Program, the FIA Foundation, and NIAID R21 R21AI139784. C.G., K.M.K., K. Koehler, and C.D.H. were supported by NIOSH ERC T42 OH0008428. Additionally, N.P., K. Kruczynski, M.G.R, K.S., and C.D.H were supported by an anonymous gift, the JHU COVID-19 Research and Response Program, and the FIA Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health gave ethical approval for this work (IRB00014420).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
