ABSTRACT
As SARS-CoV-2 and its variants continue to spread, a reliable and convenient alternative to nasopharyngeal swabbing and RT-PCR testing is needed. To test the usability and performance of saliva sample collection, saliva, nasal and nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected from a total of 338 individuals consisting of confirmed COVID-19 patients and healthy subjects. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected and performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test on saliva and nasal swabs specimens, we compared its performance to nasopharyngeal swab specimen RT-PCR as a comparator test. In saliva specimens, the positive percent agreement was 90.14%, and the negative percent agreement was 99.61%, while in nasal swab specimens, the positive percent agreement was 91.55%, and the negative percent agreement was 100%, both meeting the sensitivity and specificity criteria required by the FDA. Therefore, when considering both the reliability and convenience of testing, we found saliva testing to be the better method for large-scale and frequent self-testing.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any external funding from a third party.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
