ABSTRACT
Background Dexamethasone, a widely available glucocorticoid, was approved for use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients early in the pandemic based on the RECOVERY trial; however, evidence is still needed to support its real-world effectiveness in patients with a wide range of comorbidities and in diverse care settings.
Objectives To conduct a comparative effectiveness analysis of dexamethasone use with and without remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using electronic health record data.
Methods We conducted a retrospective real-world effectiveness analysis using the harmonized, highly granular electronic health record data of the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) Data Enclave. Analysis was restricted to COVID-19 patients in an inpatient setting, prior to vaccine availability. Primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcome was combined in-hospital death and severe outcome as defined by use of ECMO or mechanical ventilation during stay. Missing data were imputed with single imputation. Matching of dexamethasone-treated patients to non-dexamethasone-treated controls was accomplished using propensity score (PS) matching, stratified by remdesivir treatment and based on demographics, baseline laboratory values, and comorbidities. Treatment benefit was quantified using logistic regression. Further sensitivity analyses were performed using clinical adjusters in matched groups and in strata defined by quartiles of PS.
Results Regression analysis revealed a statistically significant association between dexamethasone use and reduced risk of in-hospital mortality for those not receiving remdesivir (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.95, p=0.017), and a borderline statistically significant risk for those receiving remdesivir (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.02, p=0.054). Treatment also showed secondary outcome benefit. In sensitivity analyses, treatment effect size generally remained similar with some heterogeneity of benefit across strata of PS.
Conclusions We add evidence that dexamethasone provides benefit with respect to mortality and severe outcomes in a diverse, national hospitalized sample, prior to vaccine availability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIH Grant R01 AI151176 (KJ), CDC Grant U01IP001136 (KJ), core funds of the Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin (PJR), and in part by a donation from Tito's Handmade Vodka (RZ, PJR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Texas Institutional Review Board waived ethical approval for this work; the study was determined to be "not human subjects research".
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(rzhou{at}utexas.edu)
(kjohnson{at}rockfound.org)
(paul.rathouz{at}austin.utexas.edu)
* Authorship was determined using ICMJE recommendations.
Data Availability
The N3C Data Enclave (covid.cd2h.org/enclave) houses the fully reproducible, transparent, and broadly available limited and de-identified datasets (HIPAA definitions: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html) used in this project. Data is accessible by investigators at institutions that have signed a Data Use Agreement with NIH who have taken human subjects and security training and attest to the N3C User Code of Conduct. Investigators wishing to access the limited dataset must also supply an institutional IRB protocol. All requests for data access are reviewed by the NIH Data Access Committee. A full description of the N3C Enclave governance has been published; information about how to apply for access is available on the NCATS website: https://ncats.nih.gov/n3c/about/applying-for-access. Reviewers and health authorities will be given access permission and guidance to aid reproducibility and outcomes assessment. A Frequently Asked Questions about the data and access has been created at https://ncats.nih.gov/n3c/about/program-faq. The code for this study (DUR: RP-11698A) is located within the N3C Data Enclave and can be accessed upon request, provided the user already has access to the N3C.
https://covid.cd2h.org/enclave
