ABSTRACT
Background HLA-A29-positive birdshot chorioretinitis (BCR) is an inflammatory eye disorder that is generally assumed to be caused by an autoimmune response to HLA-A29-presented peptides from retinal arrestin (SAG), yet the epitopes recognized by CD8+ T cells from patients remain to be identified.
Objectives The identification of natural ligands of SAG presented by HLA-A29. To quantify CD8+ T cells reactive to antigenic SAG peptides presented by HLA-A29 in patients and controls.
Methods We performed mass-spectrometry based immunopeptidomics of HLA-A29 of antigen-presenting cell lines from patients engineered to express SAG. MHC-I Dextramer technology was utilised to identify antigen-specific CD8+ T cells reactive to SAG peptides in complex with HLA-A29 in a cohort of BCR patients, HLA-A29-positive controls, and HLA-A29-negative controls.
Results We report on the naturally presented antigenic SAG peptides identified by sequencing the HLA-A29 immunopeptidome of antigen-presenting cells of patients. We show that the N-terminally extended SAG peptide precursors can be trimmed in vitro by the antigen-processing aminopeptidases ERAP1 and ERAP2. Unexpectedly, no antigen engagement by CD8+ T cells upon stimulation with SAG peptides was observed in patients or HLA-A29-positive controls. Multiplexed HLA-A29-peptide dextramer profiling of a case-control cohort revealed that CD8+ T cells specific for these SAG peptides were neither detectable in peripheral blood nor in eye biopsies of patients.
Conclusions Collectively, these findings demonstrate that SAG is not a CD8+ T cell autoantigen and sharply contrast the paradigm in the pathogenesis of BCR. Therefore, the mechanism by which HLA-A29 is associated with BCR does not involve SAG.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JK is supported by a VENI award from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (N.W.O. project number 016.186.006). WV is supported by UitZicht (project number 2018-1) and Stichting Lijf en Leven (project number 63). The funders had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Medical Ethical committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes