Abstract
Nutritional epidemiology studies aim to investigate the impact of diet on disease risk, and their findings inform subsequent dietary recommendations. The issue of whether foods or nutrients should be the unit of exposure in such studies is a topic of debate. However, although nutrient-based analyses can elucidate biological mechanisms, they are technically problematic; furthermore, although foods have been considered the most suitable unit of dietary exposure because “we eat food, not nutrients” and the findings of food-based analyses can be easily translated into dietary advice, there is a greater risk of confounding and/or reverse causation because food selection and consumption are closely related to socio-economic and behavioural factors. This note describes an integrated approach that combines the positive aspects of nutrient-and food-based analyses. Individual dietary exposure is characterised by its overall macro-and micronutrient compositions and, in line with the compositional nature of dietary data, methods based on log-ratio transformations of nutrient compositions are used in diet/outcome association analyses that provide fully adjusted isocaloric estimates of the impact of specific nutrient balances on health outcomes. These estimates can then be combined with the nutrient compositions of selected foods to produce outcome-related scores which, as they are defined regardless of a subject’s food selection/consumption, are not subject to confounding or reverse causation, and therefore have important implications for public health professionals. Data coming from an Italian population-based study were used to illustrate the approach in the context of diet/serum uric acid relationships, and some resulting new insights were briefly discussed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the National Research Council (CNR) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
