Abstract
Background While the incidence of newly diagnosed early-onset colorectal cancer has been increasing, age-related disparity of survival outcome and treatment-related adverse events in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has been inadequately studied with inconclusive findings. In this study, we aimed to evaluate such age-related disparity in this patient population.
Methods We used individual patient data from three clinical trials (Study 1: NCT00272051, NCT 00305188 and Study 2: NCT00364013) in Project Data Sphere. All patients were diagnosed with mCRC and received first-line 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin. Clinical and genomic data of 763 patients with mCRC from Moffitt Cancer Center were used to assess genomic alterations and serve as an external and real-world validation cohort to evaluate overall survival (OS) disparity. Survival outcomes and treatment-related adverse events were estimated and compared in patients among three age groups: <50, 50-65, and >65 years.
Results Among 1223 patients from previous clinical trials, 179 (14.6%) were younger than 50 years. These patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=1.46; 95%CI=1.22–1.76; p<0.001) and OS (HR=1.48; 95%CI=1.19–1.84; p<0.001) compared to patients in the 50-65 group of both Study 1 and Study 2 after adjustment for gender, race, and performance status. Significantly shorter OS was also observed in patients from the <50 group in the Moffitt cohort. When compared to other age groups, the <50 group had significantly higher incidence of nausea/vomiting (69.3% vs 57.6% vs 60.4%, p=0.019), severe abdominal pain (8.4% vs 3.4% vs 3.5%, p=0.018), severe anemia (6.1% vs 1.0% vs 1.5%, p<0.001), and severe rash (2.8% vs 1.2% vs 0.4%, p=0.047), but significantly lower incidence of fatigue, severe diarrhea, severe fatigue, and severe neutropenia. The <50 group had earlier onset of nausea/vomiting (1.0 vs 2.1 vs 2.6 weeks, p=0.012), mucositis (3.6 vs 5.1 vs 5.7 weeks, p=0.051), and neutropenia (8.0 vs 9.4 vs 8.4 weeks, p=0.043), and shorter duration of mucositis (0.6 vs 0.9 vs 1.0 weeks, p=0.006). In the <50 group, severe abdominal pain and severe liver toxicity were associated with both shorter OS and PFS. In contrast, moderate peripheral neuropathy was associated with longer PFS. Our genomic data showed that the <50 group had higher prevalence of CTNNB1 mutation (6.6% vs 3.1% vs 2.3%, p=0.047), ERBB2 amplification (5.1% vs 0.6% vs 2.3%, p=0.005), and CREBBP mutation (3.1% vs 0.9% vs 0.5%, p=0.050), but lower prevalence of BRAF mutation (7.7% vs 8.5% vs 16.7%, p=0.002).
Conclusions Patients with early-onset mCRC had worse survival outcome and unique adverse-event patterns, which could be partially attributed to distinct genomic profiles. Our findings might improve an individualized approach to chemotherapy, counseling, and management of treatment-related adverse events in this patient population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Scientific Review Committee/IRB of Moffitt Cancer Center through Advarra gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.