1. Abstract
Data obtained from clinical trials for a given disease often capture reliable empirical features of the highest quality which are limited to few studies/experiments. In contrast, knowledge data extracted from biomedical literature captures a wide range of clinical information relevant to a given disease that may not be as reliable as the experimental data. Therefore, we propose a novel method of training that co-optimizes two AI algorithms on experimental data and knowledge-based information from literature respectively to supplement the learning of one algorithm with that of the other and apply this method to prioritize/rank causal genes for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). One algorithm generates unsupervised embeddings for gene nodes in a protein-protein interaction network associated with experimental data. The other algorithm generates embeddings for the nodes/entities in a knowledge graph constructed from biomedical literature. Both these algorithms are co-optimized to leverage information from each other’s domain. Therefore; a downstream inferencing task to rank causal genes for AD ensures the consideration of experimental and literature data available to implicate any given gene in the geneset. Rank-based evaluation metrics computed to validate the gene rankings prioritized by our algorithm showed that the top ranked positions were highly enriched with genes from a ground truth set that were experimentally verified to be causal for the progression of AD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Genentech Inc. and Roche Holding AG
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data from GWAS catalog, UK Biobank and the Hetionet knowledge graph.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contributing authors: prabhakar.vignesh{at}gene.com, liu.kai{at}gene.com
Data Availability
The sources for all the data produced in the present work are cited in the manuscript.