Abstract
Physical function decline due to aging or disease can be assessed with quantitative motion analysis, but this currently requires expensive laboratory equipment. We introduce a self-guided quantitative motion analysis of the widely used five-repetition sit-to-stand test using a smartphone. Across 35 US states, 405 participants recorded a video performing the test in their homes. We found novel relationships not detectable in a clinical implementation of this test. Trunk angle during the sit-to-stand transition was greater in individuals with osteoarthritis and differed across ethnicities. In individuals 50 years of age or older, those with greater trunk angular acceleration had a higher mental health score. We also detected known associations between longer time to complete the five repetitions and lower physical health scores, higher BMI, and older age. Our findings demonstrate that at-home movement analysis goes beyond established clinical metrics to provide objective and inexpensive digital outcome metrics for nationwide studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships (grant no. DGE-1656518); the Stanford Catalyst for Collaborative Solutions; the Mobilize Center, which is supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Grant P41EB027060; and the Center for Reliable Sensor Technology- Based Outcomes for Rehabilitation (RESTORE), which is supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Grant No. P2CHD101913.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We obtained approval for the study from the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (IRB-59455) and digital informed consent from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos