Abstract
Objectives Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and trans and gender diverse (TGD) people are disproportionately affected by poorer sexual health outcomes compared to heterosexual populations. We aimed to explore the preferences of GBMSM and TGD for using eHealth for sexual health (eSexualHealth).
Methods We distributed an anonymous online survey among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer and other people of diverse sexuality or gender (LGBTIQA+) community in Australia. The survey collected data on sociodemographic characteristics and sexual behaviours, their preferences for app/website functions and preferred HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing reminders. We used descriptive statistics to summarise the characteristics of the study population. Free-text responses were thematically analysed.
Results Of 466 participants included, most identified as cisgender males (92.7%). The median age was 48 (interquartile range [IQR]: 37-56). For accessing sexual health-related information, 160 (34.6%) would use either a website or an app, 165 (32.7%) would prefer a website, 119 (25.8%) would prefer an app, and 33 (7.1%) would not use either platform. There was no significant difference between GBMSM and TGD people. Participants were most interested in information about STI clinics, HIV/STI hotspots, and sexual health education. Participants stressed the need for privacy and anonymity when using eHealth. Regarding reminders to test for HIV/STIs, receiving regular SMS was most popular (112/293, 38.2%), followed by regular emails (55/293 18.8%) and a reminder function on their phone (48/293, 16.4%).
Conclusion Our study suggests a promising future for eHealth among GBMSM and TGD people. Sexual health is still a stigmatised area, and eHealth may circumvent barriers this population faces.
What is already known about the topic
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and trans- and gender diverse people (TGD) have poorer sexual health outcomes compared to heterosexuals
eHealth (or digital interventions) to improve sexual health is a growing area
What this study adds
Our survey among Australian GBMSM and TGD individuals document their preferences for using eHealth to optimize their sexual health
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
Being aware of preferences for eHealth can inform resource allocation and future development of features wanted by target populations
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
EPFC and JJO are each supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172873 and GNT1193955, respectively). CKF is supported by an Australian NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant (GNT1172900).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was granted by the Alfred Ethics Committee (670/20).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Co-senior authors
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
