ABSTRACT
Background While lung cancer low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is being rolled out in many regions around the world, differentiation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules between malignant and benign remains to a challenge for screening programs. We conducted one of the first systematic investigations of circulating protein markers for their ability to assess the risk of malignancy for screen-detected pulmonary nodules.
Methods Based on four LDCT screening studies in the United States, Canada and Europe, we assayed 1078 unique protein markers in pre-diagnostic samples based on a nested case-control design with a total of 1253 participants. Protein markers were measured using proximity extension assays and the data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression, random forest, and penalized regressions.
Results We identified 36 potentially informative markers differentiating malignant nodules from benign nodules. Pathway analysis revealed a tightly connected network based on the 36 protein-coding genes. We observed a differential mRNA expression profile of the corresponding 36 mRNAs between lung tumors and adjacent normal tissues using data from The Cancer Genomic Atlas. We prioritized a panel of 9 protein markers through 10-fold nested cross-validations. We observed that circulating protein markers can increase sensitivity to 0.80 for nodule malignancy compared to the Brock model (p-value<0.001). Two additional markers were identified that were specific for lung tumors diagnosed within one year. All 11 protein markers showed general consistency in improving prediction across the four LDCT studies.
Conclusions Circulating protein markers can help to differentiate between malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. Validating these results in an independent CT-screening study will be required prior to clinical implementation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by NIH U19 CA203654 (INTEGRAL) and Canadian Institute for Health Research (FDN 167273). LMM was also supported by ISCIII Fondo de Investigacióin Sanitaria-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (PI19/00098; PI22/00451), Lung Ambition Alliance and Fundación Roberto Arnal Planelles.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of the Mount Sinai Hospital gave ethical approval for this work. The Ethics approval was also obtained from local institutes at each study site.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This work is supported by NIH U19 CA203654 (INTEGRAL) and Canadian Institute for Health Research (FDN 167273). LMM was also supported by ISCIII Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (PI19/00098; PI22/00451), Lung Ambition Alliance and Fundación Roberto Arnal Planelles.
Disclaimer Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization.
Ethics Ethics committee/IRB of the Mount Sinai Hospital gave ethical approval for this work. The Ethics approval was also obtained from local institutes at each study sites.
Availability of Data The dataset presented in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request and committee approval.
Conflict of Interests Authors declared no conflict of interest.
The manuscript sections are reordered for clarity.
Data Availability
The dataset presented in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request and committee approval.
