Abstract
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis promises to improve the care of people with cancer, address health inequities and guide translational research. This observational cohort study used ctDNA to follow 29 New Zealand (NZ) unresectable advanced-stage cutaneous melanoma patients through multiple cycles of immunotherapy, to identify the breadth and complexity of tumour genomic information that ctDNA analysis can reliably report. During the course of treatment, a high level of dynamic mutational complexity was identified in blood plasma of these patients, including: multiple BRAF mutations in the same patient, clinically-relevant BRAF mutations emerging through therapy, and co-occurring sub-clonal BRAF and NRAS mutations. The technical validity of this ctDNA analysis was supported by high sample analysis-reanalysis concordance as well as by concordance between three ctDNA measurement technologies: droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a custom melanoma-specific amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel and mass spectrometry. In addition, we observed >90% concordance in the detection of ctDNA when using cell-stabilising collection tubes followed by 7-day delayed processing, compared to standard EDTA blood collection protocols with rapid processing. We also found that undetectability of ctDNA at a proportion of treatment cycles was associated with both clinical benefit (best RECIST response) and prognosis (disease-specific survival). In summary, we found that multiple ctDNA processing and analysis methods consistently identified complex longitudinal patterns of clinically-relevant mutations, adding support for expanded implementation of this technology to guide in-treatment tailored cancer therapy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by National Science Challenge Healthier Lives - He Oranga Hauora, Cancer Research Trust, William Staunton Memorial Scholarship
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NZ Health and Disability Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work to be undertaken at the University of Auckland. Approval number 16/NTA/180
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Submission revised to included acknowledgements
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
