Abstract
In high income countries one in five children still lives in poverty. This is known to adversely shape the life course health trajectory of these children; however, much less is understood on whether social and fiscal policies have the capacity to reverse this damage, which intervention is likely to be most effective and when these interventions should be delivered to maximise their impact. This systematic review attempts to address these questions by looking at the impact of income-support interventions delivered during the first 1,000 days of life on cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory and mental health outcomes. The review was restricted to experimental or quasi experimental studies conducted in high income countries. Studies of interest were retrieved from multidisciplinary database as well as health, economic, social sciences-specific literature browsers. Evidence of interest were summarised via narrative synthesis approach. Robustness of findings was assessed by tabulating impact by health outcome, type of intervention and study design. Overall, 18 relevant papers were identified, including 16 independent studies, one meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) and one pooled analysis of RCTs. Income-support interventions included: unconditional/conditional cash transfers, income tax credit, welfare to work, and minimum wage salary policies. Most studies were conducted in North America. Overall, the evidence suggested a positive, albeit small, effect of most policies on birth weight outcomes, but limited effect on mental health indicators. Results seemed to be robust to the type of intervention, but not to the study design, with RCTs consistently less likely to detect an impact. Given the large number of people targeted by these programs, one could infer that – despite small – the observed effect may be still relevant at population level. Nonetheless, the limited generalisability of the evidence gathered hampers firm conclusions. For the future, the breath and scope of this literature need to be broadened to fully exploit the potential of these interventions and understand how their public health impact can be maximised.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The LIFECYCLE project has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 733206. This publication reflects only the authors views and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
