ABSTRACT
Studies have shown increased immunogenicity from heterologous boosting. This study specifically assessed boosting with Pfizer-BioNTech in Sputnik V vaccination regimens. Reactogenicity was assessed through adverse events. Immunogenicity was assessed by comparing serum anti-Spike (Anti-S) protein antibody and neutralizing antibody titers before booster administration and after 30 days. A total of 428 participants were recruited in the heterologous arm and 351 in the homologous arm. Adverse events were more frequent in the heterologous arm (p<0.001). No serious adverse events were reported in either arm. Amongst 577 individuals who completed the study, Anti-S antibodies were 14.8 times higher after heterologous boosting, and 3.1 times higher after homologous boosting (p<0.001). Similarly, heterologous boosting showed a 2 fold increase in neutralizing antibodies, compared to a 1.6 fold increase in homologous boosting (p<0.001). In conclusion, both boosting regimens elicited an immunological response, nonetheless heterologous Pfizer-BioNTech showed a higher immunological response, with more adverse effects.
ARTICLE SUMMARY LINE Both homologous and heterologous boosting are effective in eliciting an immunological response, however heterologous boosting with Pfizer-BioNTech elicited a higher immunological response, with more adverse effects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All methods and data analysis were approved by the National COVID-19 Research and Ethics Committee and the National Health Regulatory Authority (NHRA) Clinical Trails Committee in Bahrain.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
BIOLOGICAL SKETCH Marwa Almadhi is a medical student at the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK with a background in Biomedical Sciences at UCL, London, UK. Her current research interests are infectious diseases and public health.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author
