ABSTRACT
Background Worm infections are among the most prevalent neglected tropical diseases worldwide. Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths infections, most common worm infections affecting Rwandan school-aged children, are addressed by the national deworming program since 2014. To date, no published studies have assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the key implementers of the national deworming program conducted at village and school level. This study aimed to assess key stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perspectives about the decentralized national deworming program.
Methods/ Principal Findings We carried out a quantitative, cross-sectional study with complementary in-depth interviews in two districts of Rwanda in June 2021. From the 852 surveyed community health workers and teachers, 54.1% had a knowledge score considered good (≥80%). The mean knowledge score was 78.04%. From the multivariate analysis, lack of training was shown to increase the odds of having poor knowledge (OR 0.487, 95% CI: 0.328 – 0.722, p <0.001). The in-depths interviews revealed poor water access and hesitance from caregivers as perceived challenges to the success of the deworming program.
Conclusion Our findings demonstrate the importance of training community health workers and schoolteachers on worm infections as they are the key implementers of the deworming program. This would enhance their capacity to provide health education and sensitization on misconceptions and misinformation towards deworming. Moreover, research is needed to assess the impact of poor access to water, sanitation and hygiene facilities on the prevalence of worm infections in Rwanda.
AUTHOR SUMMARY Worm infections affect over 2 billion people worldwide, and the most common are schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections. In Rwanda, the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections can be as high as 45%, while the prevalence of schistosomiasis is 2.7% among school-aged children.
The government of Rwanda continues to develop initiatives to eradicate worm infection, among which, the national decentralized deworming program, implemented at village and school level.
In this program, community health workers collaborate with teachers and local leaders to administer deworming tablets, community sensitization and health education. To date, no published studies have been conducted to understand the experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders in the national deworming program in Rwanda. We conducted a quantitative analysis of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) of teachers and community health workers, and a qualitative assessment of the perspectives of local leaders in two of the most food insecure districts of Rwanda. The results show a gap in the knowledge of community health workers and teachers on worm infections. The study also revealed that there were some misconceptions about deworming tablets, which highlights the need to train key implementers of the program for them to transfer their knowledge to the broader community.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Global Health Equity institutional review board
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos