Abstract
Rare Mendelian disorders pose a major diagnostic challenge and collectively affect 300-400 million patients worldwide. Many automated tools aim to uncover causal genes in patients with suspected genetic disorders, but evaluation of these tools is limited due to the lack of comprehensive benchmark datasets that include previously unpublished conditions. In this chapter, we present a computational pipeline that simulates realistic clinical datasets to address this deficit. Our framework jointly simulates complex phenotypes and challenging candidate genes and produces patients with novel genetic conditions. We demonstrate the similarity of our simulated patients to real patients from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network and evaluate common gene prioritization methods on the simulated cohort. These prioritization methods recover known gene-disease associations but perform poorly on diagnosing patients with novel genetic disorders. Our publicly-available dataset and codebase can be utilized by medical genetics researchers to evaluate, compare, and improve tools that aid in the diagnostic process.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
E.A. is supported by a Microsoft Research PhD Fellowship. S.F. is supported by award Number T32GM007753 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. M.L. is supported by T32HG002295 from the National Human Genome Research Institute and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. UDN research reported in this manuscript was supported by the NIH Common Fund, through the Office of Strategic Coordination/Office of the NIH Director under Award Number(s) \\ U01HG007709, U01HG010219, U01HG010230, U01HG010217, U01HG010233, U01HG010215, U01HG007672, U01HG007690, U01HG007708, U01HG007703, U01HG007674, U01HG007530, U01HG007942, U01HG007943, U01TR001395, U01TR002471, U54NS108251, and U54NS093793. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Undiagnosed Diseases Network study is approved by the National Institutes of Health institutional review board (IRB), which serves as the central IRB for the study (Protocol 15HG0130).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The simulated patient dataset as well as all intermediate data used in its creation are shared with the research community via Harvard Dataverse at the DOI: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ANFOR3. Anonymized UDN data has been deposited in dbGaP (accession phs001232) and PhenomeCentral. Phenotypes and causal variants and genes related to UDN diagnoses are also shared publicly in ClinVar: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/submitters/505999/.