Abstract
Background Interventions that combine cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with unconditional cash transfers (UCT) reduce the risk of antisocial behavior (ASB), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. In this paper, we test the role of psychological and cognitive mechanisms in explaining this effect. We assessed the mediating role of executive function, self-control, and time preferences.
Methods We used data from the Sustainable Transformation of Youth in Liberia, a community-based randomized controlled trial of criminally engaged men. The men were randomized into: Group-1: control (n=237); and Group-2: CBT+UCT (n=207). ASB was measured 12-13 months after the interventions were completed, and the following mediators were assessed 2-5 weeks later: (i) self-control, (ii) time preferences and (iii) executive functions. We estimated the natural direct effect (NDE) and the natural indirect effect (NIE) of the intervention over ASB.
Results Self-control, time preferences and a weighted index of all three mediators were associated with ASB scores, but the intervention had an effect on time preferences only [B= 0.09 95%CI (0.03; 0.15)]. There was no evidence that the effect of the intervention on ASB was mediated by self-control [BNIE= 0.007 95%CI (-0.01; 0.02)], time preferences [BNIE= -0.02 95%CI (-0.05; 0.01)], executive functions [BNIE= 0.002 95%CI (-0.002; 0.006)] or the weighted index of the mediators [BNIE= -0.0005 95%CI (-0.03; 0.02)].
Conclusions UCT and CBT lead to improvements in ASB, even in the absence of mediation via psychological and cognitive functions. Findings suggest that the causal mechanisms may involve non-psychological pathways.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
"N/A"
Funding Statement
This study is an output of the CHANCES-6 study. This work was supported by the UKRI’s Global Challenges Research Fund (ES/S001050/1). The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is gratefully acknowledged. AM received support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil. CSP received support from CAPES/PRINT grant number 88887.310343/2018-00 and Fundo Mackpesquisa.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for secondary analysis of quantitative data conducted at King’s College London was obtained from the Ethics Office of King’s College London Research (LRS-19/20-15050). Only persons who provided informed consent for the original study were included in the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data sources for the quantitative analysis are secondary sources, which are already publicly available at: https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/113056/version/V1/view
https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/113056/version/V1/view
