Abstract
Background Physicians are often asked to counsel patients about driving safety after syncope, yet little empirical data guides such advice.
Methods We identified a population-based retrospective cohort of 9,507 individuals with a driver license who were discharged from any of six urban emergency departments (EDs) with a diagnosis of ‘syncope and collapse’. We examined all police-reported crashes that involved a cohort member as a driver and occurred between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016. We categorized crash-involved drivers as ‘responsible’ or ‘non-responsible’ for their crash using detailed police-reported crash data and a validated responsibility scoring tool. We then used logistic regression to test the hypothesis that recent syncope was associated with driver responsibility for crash.
Results Over the 7-year study interval, cohort members were involved in 475 police-reported crashes: 210 drivers were deemed responsible and 133 drivers were deemed non-responsible for their crash; the 132 drivers deemed to have indeterminate responsibility were excluded from further analysis. An ED visit for syncope occurred in the three months leading up to crash in 11 crash-responsible drivers and in 5 crash-non-responsible drivers, suggesting that recent syncope was not associated with driver responsibility for crash (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95%CI, 0.40-4.74; p=0.67). However, all drivers with cardiac syncope were deemed responsible, precluding calculation of an odds ratio for this important subgroup.
Conclusions Recent syncope was not significantly associated with driver responsibility for traffic crash. Clinicians and policymakers should consider these results when making fitness-to-drive recommendations after syncope.
Key Messages
What is already known on this topic: Clinicians are often asked to counsel patients about driving safety after syncope, yet little empirical data guides such advice.
What this study adds: In contrast to prior studies, we found no significant association between an emergency department visit for syncope and driver responsibility for a subsequent motor vehicle crash.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy: These findings might reassure clinicians, patients and policymakers that current driving restrictions after first-episode syncope adequately mitigate the risk of subsequent crash.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number PJT-148849). JS' salary was supported by the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and by a Health Professional-Investigator Award from Michael Smith Health Research BC. JB was supported by Michael Smith Health Research BC and the British Columbia Emergency Medicine Network. Funding organizations were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review and approval of this manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board approved the study (H16-02043).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding sources: This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number PJT-148849). JS’ salary was supported by the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and by a Health Professional-Investigator Award from Michael Smith Health Research BC. JB was supported by Michael Smith Health Research BC and the British Columbia Emergency Medicine Network. Funding organizations were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review and approval of this manuscript.
Competing interests: All authors report no competing interests.
(john.staples{at}ubc.ca)
(shannonerdelyi{at}gmail.com)
(aquanut.nut325{at}gmail.com)
(yip.candace{at}gmail.com)
(mayesha.khan{at}ubc.ca)
(dar{at}ices.on.ca)
(herbert.chan{at}ubc.ca)
(jeff.brubacher{at}ubc.ca)
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study must be accessed through Population Data BC. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under contract for this study. Data are available through Population Data BC with the permission of authors and the Data Stewards.