ABSTRACT
Background Early childhood poverty is associated with poorer health and educational outcomes in adolescence. However, there is limited evidence about the clustering of these adverse outcomes by income group.
Methods We analysed five outcomes at age 17 known to limit life chances – psychological distress, self-assessed ill health, smoking, obesity, and poor educational achievement – using data from the longitudinal UK Millennium Cohort Study (N=15,245). We compared how single and multiple outcomes were distributed across quintiles of household income in early childhood (0-5 years) and modelled the maximum potential benefit of tackling the income gradient in these outcomes.
Findings Children from the poorest households were 12.7(95% CI 6.4-25.1) times more likely than those from the richest to experience four or five adverse adolescent outcomes, with poor educational achievement and smoking showing the largest single risk ratios–4.6(95% CI: 4.2-5.0) and 3.6(95% CI 3.0-4.2), respectively. We modelled hypothetical absolute and relative poverty elimination scenarios, as well as an income inequality elimination scenario, and found these would yield maximum reductions in multiple adolescent adversity of 5%, 30%, and 80% respectively.
Interpretation Early childhood poverty is more strongly correlated with multiple adolescent adversity than any single adverse outcome. Reducing absolute poverty alone is not sufficient to eliminate the life-long burden of multiple adversity, which disproportionately impacts children across the bottom three-fifths of the income distribution. An ambitious levelling up agenda needs co-ordinated multi-agency action to tackle the complex interacting factors generating the steep social gradient in multiple adolescent adversity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by UK Prevention Research Partnership (MR/S037527/1)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data used are openly available data secondary data available from the UK Data Service. Series: beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000031
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
