Abstract
Background and Aim An essential issue for Kawasaki Disease (KD) is the development of coronary artery disease. We decided to investigate (VEGF) subtype gene expression in KD due to the proangiogenic nature of Vasoactive Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGF). VEGF-A is a known angiogenic molecule with pro-inflammatory effects, whereas the role of VEGFB has been less defined.
Method KD Microarray and RNA-seq datasets were selected using a comprehensive search strategy of the NCBI GEO Dataset, which resulted in eight studies from whole blood. This included three extensive studies in KD (KD1-KD3). Further, one study dataset from coronary artery tissue, the Coronary Artery Dataset (CAD), was also included to appreciate end-stage KD.
Results In CAD, cases of KD versus controls, VEGF-B was up-regulated (p = 4.932e-02). KD1, KD Acute versus convalescent samples, VEGF-A is up-regulated (p=1.258e-07) and VEGF-B was down-regulated (p=1.42e-28). Similar up regulation of VEGF-A and down regulation of VEGF-B was seen in KD2 (p=1.140e-04; p=1.746e-02) and KD3 (p=1.140e-04; p=1.746e-02), both are KD Versus Controls. VEGF-A up-regulated (p=1.140e-04), VEGF-B down-regulated (p=1.746e-02).KD3, KD versus Control; VEGF-A up-regulated (p=1.140e-04), VEGF-B down regulated (p=1.746e-02).
Conclusions In acute KD VEGF-A up-regulation, with VEGFB being down-regulated, the reverse being true of the convalescent situation. This suggests a temporal inverse relationship between VEGF-A and VEGF-B may have biomarker implications. Moreover, a dual therapeutic strategy, enhancing VEGFB while minimizing VEGFA effects, could be a possible advancement over current KD related-therapies. Further work defining the relationship of VEGF-A to VEGF-B in KD-related angiogenesis is suggested.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NMC Ethics and Research Committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
There are no financial relationships to disclose on behalf of the authors
Data Availability
Publicly available on the GEO NCBI Webserver at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ with Accession Numbers GSE63881, GSE73461, GSE68004, GSE64486, GSE16797, GSE15297, GSE18606, GSE48498, GSE109351