“Having a newborn is stressful enough:” Mothers’ experiences during the 2022 Infant Formula Shortage in Washington D.C.

Introduction

An unprecedented shortage of infant formula occurred in the United States (US) in 2022. This is alarming because the vast majority of US infants are partially or entirely reliant on infant formula for nutrition, with only one in four infants exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.¹ The infant formula shortage was caused in part by voluntary recalls of several formulas produced by Abbott Nutrition, shutdown of an Abbott Nutrition plant in Michigan in February 2022 due to bacterial contamination,² and ongoing supply chain interruptions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.³ Because Abbott is among the largest suppliers of infant formula in the US, and produces specialized formulas for infants with severe allergies, gastrointestinal conditions, and metabolic disorders,⁴ access to specialized formulas rapidly diminished early in 2022. This resulted in a lack of appropriate nutrition for infants with these and other health conditions.⁵ In the months to follow, the availability of more routine formulas also declined drastically, posing widespread challenges to infant feeding nationwide.⁵ The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate mothers’ experiences during the infant formula shortage and to examine perceived impacts of the shortage on infants’ diet and health. The findings reported herein are from interviews conducted with predominantly non-Hispanic White and highly educated mothers, and will be updated following completion of an ongoing second phase of interviews with a more diverse population, including low-income mothers, in Washington D.C.

Materials and Methods

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted virtually (via Zoom™) with mothers of infants under 8 months of age. Mothers from throughout Washington D.C. were recruited using community listservs and social media groups. Interested mothers were contacted by the research team to determine study eligibility. Inclusion criteria included mothers’ report that they: (1) resided in Washington D.C. and (2) had a child less than 8 months old. Recruitment took place from June 20, 2022 to July 11, 2022, and interviews occurred between June 22, 2022 and July 14, 2022. All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the George Washington University (IRB #: NCR224282).

Eligible mothers were scheduled for a virtual study meeting with a research team member (ACS), which took place in a private Zoom™ room. Mothers provided informed consent via RedCap™, prior to completing a brief survey. The survey included questions about the mother’s and infant’s demographics, infant anthropometrics, how the mother was feeding their infant, and what types of information the mother received about infant feeding. Following completion of the survey, an in-depth interview was conducted by a trained interviewer (ACS) using a semi-structured guide developed collaboratively by the research team. The guide included questions about mothers’ feelings related to the infant formula shortage, how difficult it was to find formula during the shortage, the extent to which mothers perceived the infant formula shortage impacted their infants’ diet, weight, and health, and how the shortage affected their experience as the mother of an infant. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim using NVivo Transcription. Each mother received $50 as compensation for participation.

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants’ demographic information and survey responses. Three coders (SAH, HRM, and JTK) independently coded an initial subset of three transcripts using Microsoft Word, which formed the basis for creation of a shared codebook. The remaining transcripts were then coded by two coders using the shared codebook. The coders added new codes as they emerged and reorganized existing codes, as appropriate, to develop the final codebook. All transcripts were subsequently reviewed to ensure that coding was performed in accordance with the final codebook, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion amongst the coders, with assistance from the interviewer (ACS). Emergent themes and subthemes were then identified, discussed amongst the research team, and refined collaboratively. Representative quotations for each theme and subtheme were selected.

Results

Twenty-eight mothers enrolled in this mixed-method study. The sample was predominantly White (68%) and highly educated, with 64% of the participants reporting completion of a graduate or doctorate degree (Table 1). Two mothers reported their household received nutrition assistance through SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and/or WIC (Women, Infants, and Children). The mean age of the infants was 4.6 months. Approximately half reported their infant was female (54% reported having a girl, 46% reported having a boy) and about two-thirds reported that they were using infant formula, whether exclusively (26%) or in combination with breast milk (37%). Of those using formula, over half (59%) reported that they had to switch the brand and/or type of formula they provided to their infant due to the shortage.

A key overarching theme was the infant formula shortage adversely impacted mothers’ mental and emotional health (Table 2). Mothers experienced significant anxiety related to the infant formula shortage, specifically surrounding the prospect of not being able to find formula as well as fear that other mothers would be unable to locate formula. They also described feelings of shock and disbelief that a formula shortage could happen in the US. Even mothers who were exclusively breastfeeding reported considerable anxiety about the possibility of having to rely on infant formula, given the possibility that it may not be available. Mothers explained that they had feelings of general stress about the shortage, as well as anger about the situation. Guilt about feeding their infant formula and heightened pressure to breastfeed were also described.

Another key overarching theme was that navigating the infant formula shortage came with significant financial and other intangible costs (Table 3). Although most mothers explained that it was not difficult for their family to afford formula, they described spending more money on formula than they had planned, due to the rising cost of formula, the need to purchase formula in larger quantities or “stockpile.” Mothers also described intangible costs, including spending exorbitant amounts of time and energy searching for formula; this entailed driving from store to store, sometimes for hours at a time, and by searching online. Mothers also described sacrificing their physical and emotional health, lifestyle, and sleep to prolong breastfeeding and/or continue pumping to avoid reliance on formula.

A third overarching theme was that the shortage led to changes in infant feeding practices (Table 4). Mothers described continuing to breastfeed and pump breast milk, despite having planned to stop breastfeeding, to prevent reliance on and/or conserve formula. They also mentioned freezing extra milk to have a back-up option, and in some cases, donating their extra breast milk to help other families. Mothers also explained that they purchased large quantities of formula at one time to ensure they would have enough if they were subsequently unable to locate formula. Mothers also reported making efforts to conserve formula by reducing how much formula they provided to their baby, saving leftover formula, and encouraging their baby to finish bottles, as well as earlier introduction of solid foods.

Another overarching theme was mothers found social networks helpful in locating and obtaining infant formula, but they did not feel supported by the government (Table 5). Mothers explained that they were able to locate formula through social media groups and had friends and family living in other parts of the country send or bring formula to them. They also described a new or amplified sense of community, where mothers looked out for each other and were unified due to the difficulty of the situation. Meanwhile, mothers expressed frustration at the lack of solutions provided by the government and felt that addressing the formula shortage was not prioritized by politicians.

A final emergent theme was that mothers felt lucky to be able to breastfeed and have resources to obtain formula (Table 6). Mothers explained feeling fortunate that their baby was able to latch and/or that their milk supply was plentiful. Mothers also reported feeling grateful that they had resources to obtain formula, including supportive family members and friends, paid maternity leave, financial means to purchase more expensive formula or enroll in formula subscription services, and to live near a plethora of retail outlets that sold infant formula.

Discussion

The infant formula shortage adversely impacted mothers’ mental and emotional health; and, navigating the situation had significant and unanticipated financial, physical, emotional, and lifestyle-related (e.g., time) costs. While mothers did not report serious detrimental effects of the shortage on their infants’ health, they commonly explained that they altered their planned and/or preferred feeding practices to ensure their infant received adequate nutrition. However, mothers in the present study were predominantly White and highly educated, and it is likely that the shortage has more significantly impacted women with lower educational attainment and limited financial and/or social resources. Infants from low-income households are also more likely to be reliant on infant formula; 56% of all US infant formula sold each year is consumed by infants enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program.⁶ This is related to persistent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in breastfeeding in the US,^7,8 which result in large part from social determinants including disparities in access to paid maternity leave, lactation support, and breastfeeding education.⁹ In fact, a mother in our sample who was enrolled in WIC described significant financial strain from “wasting” WIC benefits. One WIC voucher purchases five cans of formula, but if fewer than five cans were available, she was forced to use an entire voucher to obtain whatever formula she could. Because this mother could not maximize her WIC benefits, she had to pay for additional formula out of pocket. While this was mentioned only by one participant in this initial sample, it may re-emerge in our ongoing second phase of interviews with mothers from lower-income households.

Adverse consequences of the infant formula shortage on mothers’ mental and emotional health are particularly alarming because the postpartum period is already a time of heightened stress.¹⁰ In the year following the birth of a child, fifteen percent of women suffer from postpartum anxiety¹¹ and approximately 12.5% of women in the US have postpartum depression.¹² Both conditions have unfavorable short and long-term impacts on maternal health and infant growth¹³ and development,¹⁴ and also interfere with mother-child bonding¹⁵ and infant feeding outcomes.¹⁶ Even in the absence of postpartum anxiety and/or depression, the months following childbirth involve sleep exhaustion, feelings of isolation, new demands of parenting, and changes in physique and sexuality, all of which detract from mothers’ mental and physical health.¹⁷ The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated mental health challenges during the postpartum period and posed a barrier to postpartum women in accessing medical care and social support.¹⁸ This is not surprising, as the prevalence of psychiatric illnesses is reported to increase disproportionately among postpartum women during disasters (e.g., earthquakes) and events (e.g., terrorist attacks) relative to other segments of the population.¹⁹

Difficulty finding formula and the prospect of hypothetically being unable to feed their infant were key contributors to reported increases in stress and anxiety associated with the infant formula shortage. Mothers also described experiencing amplified pressure to breastfeed and heightened feelings of guilt associated with providing infant formula. Even in the absence of an infant formula shortage and global pandemic, feelings of maternal shame and anxiety surrounding infant feeding decisions,²⁰ and an appalling lack of social and institutional support for breastfeeding in the US²¹ are well-documented. And even among mothers in our study who reported exclusively breastfeeding, considerable anxiety about their milk supply and ability to avoid switching to formula, due to the shortage, were described. Stress associated with the perception of inadequate milk supply is widespread, and often leads to supplementation with infant formula.²² It is particularly notable that this high level of stress surrounding continuation of breastfeeding was described among mothers fortunate to have access to home lactation consultations, lengthy paid maternity leaves, and remote work arrangements.

Mothers whose infants were fed formula described spending exorbitant amounts of time searching for formula, which further aggravated their stress and anxiety associated with the shortage. Time spent searching for formula was reported to disrupt work productivity and detract from time spent with older children. While mothers in the present study were able to devote the necessary time, energy, and resources to locating formula, this may not be feasible for women of lower socioeconomic status; for example, due to a lack of childcare, less flexible work schedules, and/or limited options for transportation. Considering that time constraints are a key barrier to healthy eating and physical activity among postpartum women,²³ which are important for preventing postpartum weight retention²⁴ and psychological morbidity^25,26, the excessive time spent searching for formula may have indirect, unfavorable impacts on mothers’ physical and psychological health.

Mothers fortunately did not report any serious detrimental effects of the shortage on their infants’ health, apart from adverse gastrointestinal consequences (e.g., diarrhea, gas, discomfort) from switching formula types. The avoidance of more serious infant health problems was predominantly attributed to being able to breastfeed and/or to ultimately finding sufficient formula after taking extreme or unconventional measures to acquire sufficient formula (e.g., leveraging social and family networks, searching store after store to find formula). While reported changes such as conserving formula through saving leftover formula for subsequent feeds and encouraging their infant to finish bottles did not result in major health problems, these practices are inconsistent with federal bottle-feeding guidance²⁷ and may pose risks to infants both in terms of food safety,²⁷ and contribute to overfeeding.²⁸ Furthermore, mothers also reported providing their infant with solid foods earlier than planned, which is concerning because early introduction of solids is associated with later childhood obesity, particularly among formula-fed infants.²⁹

Social, partner, and family support were widely described as critical facilitators of acquiring infant formula during the shortage, and are known to positively influence mothers’ physical and mental health during the postpartum period.^30-32 Mothers explained that they used social media to locate formula and described social media groups as a key source of support in navigating the shortage. Social media is an important source of social support during pregnancy and postpartum,^33,34 and further efforts to provide postpartum women with support and reputable resources through both online and in-person social networks are warranted. Mothers in our study did not take these networks for granted; however, they explained that the formula shortage made them feel even more fortunate to have the resources and support systems to obtain formula.

A key limitation of this study is enrollment of a predominantly non-Hispanic White and highly educated sample of mothers, who had the financial, social, and educational resources to overcome significant challenges resulting from the infant formula shortage. Findings therefore may not be generalizable to low-income and minority households, or the broader population of postpartum women in the US. It is essential to understand the perspectives of mothers from low-income and/or minority backgrounds, who may have had different experiences during the infant formula shortage. For those living in low-income households, financial and intangible burdens associated with the formula shortage may detrimentally influence household food security and pose a barrier to affording other key necessities such as housing. Although we initially circulated advertisements for this study across Washington D.C., we are now using more targeted recruitment efforts and have narrowed the study eligibility criteria to specifically engage mothers from more diverse and disadvantaged backgrounds in the ongoing, second phase of interviews.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine mothers’ experiences during the 2022 infant formula shortage. Findings call attention to concerning impacts of the infant formula shortage on mothers’ mental and emotional health, and underscore the importance of social and family support in locating and acquiring infant formula, as well as the urgent need for policy solutions to address this unprecedented crisis. These initial findings warrant further research to elucidate perceived impacts of the formula shortage among mothers who may lack financial and/or social resources to locate and obtain formula, and will inform development of intervention strategies to ensure that mothers can adequately nourish their infants during this and other unanticipated situations.