Abstract
Objective The increased stress the globe has experienced with the COVID-19 pandemic has affected mental health, disproportionately affecting women. However, how perceived stress in the first year affected menstrual and menopausal symptoms has not yet been investigated.
Methods Residents in British Columbia, Canada, were surveyed online as part of the COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Study of a Provincial Population-Based Cohort for Gender and Sex (RESPPONSE). A subgroup (n=4171) who were assigned female sex at birth (age 25-69) and were surveyed within the first 6-12 months of the pandemic (August 2020-February 2021), prior to the widespread rollout of vaccines, were retrospectively asked if they noticed changes in their menstrual or menopausal symptoms, as well as completing validated measures of stress, depression, and anxiety.
Results We found that 27.8% reported menstrual cycle disturbances and 6.7% reported increased menopause symptoms. Those who scored higher on perceived stress, depression, and anxiety scales were more likely to have reproductive cycle disturbances. Free text responses revealed that reasons for disturbances were perceived to be related to the pandemic.
Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to research women’s health issues, such as menstruation. Our data indicates that in the first year of the pandemic, almost a third of the menstruating population reported disturbances in their cycle, which is approximately two times higher than in non-pandemic situations and four times higher than any reported changes in menopausal symptoms across that first year of the pandemic.
Summary Sentences Women+ with higher anxiety, depression or perceived stress scores during the first year of the pandemic were more likely to have experienced menstrual cycle phase disturbance or menopausal status disruption. Younger women were particularly prone to disturbances in their reproductive cycles.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project was from a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Grant (19055) and a BC Women's Health Foundation Grant (LRZ30421) both awarded to LAB and GSO. Additional support was provided by CIHR (PJT-148662) awarded to LAMG.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was received from the British Columbia Childrens and Womens Research Ethics board (H2001421). All methods performed as a part of this study were in accordance with the UBC Research Ethics Board guidelines.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Statements and Declarations
Funding: Funding for this project was from a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Grant (19055) and a BC Women’s Health Foundation Grant (LRZ30421) both awarded to LAB and GSO. Additional support was provided by CIHR (PJT-148662) awarded to LAMG.
Conflict of Interests The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical Approval Ethical approval was received from the BC Children’s and Women’s Research Ethics board (H20–01421). All methods performed as a part of this study were in accordance with the UBC Research Ethics Board guidelines.
Informed consent to participate was obtained from participants.
Data Availability Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical restrictions. Data are available from the UBC Research Ethics Board (contact via cwreb{at}bcchr.ubc.ca) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
Used a different analysis to account for age and chronic illness.
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical restrictions. Data are available from the UBC Research Ethics Board (contact via cwreb{at}bcchr.ubc.ca) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
