Abstract
As of late, the Covid infection 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a pandemic sickness in more than 200 nations, therefore impacting billions of people. To control the spread of the coronavirus, it is crucial to detect infected individuals and ensure their complete isolation to prevent further infection. Chest X-rays and CT-scans have been proven to be very promising as signals of the infection can be clearly shown in lung areas. Transfer learning from ImageNet dataset has become the latent trend in medical imaging applications. However, there are major differences between ImageNet and medical imaging datasets. Therefore, the feasibility of transfer learning in medical applications remains questionable. This paper investigates the performance of five fine-tuned pre-trained models for chest x-rays and CT-scans classification in contrast with a deep CNN model built from scratch. DenseNet121, Resnet-50, Inception v2, Resnet101-V2 and VGG16 are selected and initialized with either random or pre-trained weights to classify augmented images into two classes: Covid and non-Covid. The performance evaluation proves the minuscule impact of training transfer learning models for good quality results, as all CNN models contribute almost equally to the classification and achieve considerable results in terms of precision, accuracy, recall and F1 score.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/8h65ywd2jr/2 https://www.kaggle.com/plameneduardo/sarscov2-ctscan-dataset
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/8h65ywd2jr/2 https://www.kaggle.com/plameneduardo/sarscov2-ctscan-dataset
