Abstract
Hyperreflexia is common after neurological injury such as stroke, yet clinical interventions have had mixed success. Our previous research has shown that hyperreflexia of the rectus femoris (RF) during pre-swing is closely associated with reduced swing phase knee flexion in those with post-stroke Stiff-Knee gait (SKG). Thus, reduction of RF hyperreflexia may improve walking function in those with SKG after stroke. A non-pharmacological and non-surgical procedure for reducing hyperreflexia has emerged based on operant conditioning of spinal reflexes elicited using electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerve, known as an H-reflex. Operant H-reflex conditioning training of the soleus has improved clinical gait function in those with spinal cord injury. It is currently unknown whether operant conditioning can be applied to the RF or those after stroke. This feasibility study trained 7 participants (5 neurologically intact, 2 post-stroke) over a period of 3 months, up to 3 times per week, to down-condition the RF H-reflex using visual feedback. We found an overall decrease in average RF H-reflex amplitude among 7 participants (44% drop, p<0.001, paired t-test), of which the post-stroke individuals contributed (49% drop). We observed a generalized training effect across quadriceps muscles. Post-stroke individuals exhibited improvements in peak knee-flexion velocity, reflex excitability during walking, and clinical measures of spasticity. These aforementioned neuromuscular outcomes provide promising initial results that operant RF H-reflex conditioning is feasible both in healthy and post-stroke individuals. This procedure could provide a targeted alternative to spasticity management and avoid the drawbacks of drugs and surgery.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05467774
Funding Statement
This work was financially supported in part by the NIH/NICHD (P2CHD086844, Kautz), and JS is the recipient. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NICHD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of University of Texas at Austin gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
5 jss280{at}case.edu
Funding This work was financially supported in part by the NIH/NICHD (P2CHD086844, Kautz), and JS is the recipient. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NICHD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Declaration
Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethics approval This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and had ethical approval from University of Texas Institutional Review Board. All subjects gave written informed consent prior to data collection.
Data availability The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
