Abstract
Monitoring healthcare quality at a subnational resolution is key to identify and resolve geographic inequities and ensure that no sub-population is left behind. Yet, health facility surveys are typically not powered to report reliable estimates at a subnational scale.
In this study, we present a framework to fill this gap and jointly analyse publicly available facility survey data, allowing exploration of temporal trends and subnational disparities in healthcare quality metrics. Specifically, our Bayesian hierarchical model includes random effects to account for differences between survey instruments; space-time processes to leverage correlations in space and time; and covariates to incorporate auxiliary information. We apply this framework to Kenya, Senegal, and Tanzania - three countries with at least four rounds of standardized facility surveys each – and estimate the readiness and process quality of sick-child care over time and across subnational areas.
These estimates of readiness and process quality of care over time and at a fine spatial resolution show uneven progress in improving facility-based service provision in Kenya, Senegal, and Tanzania. For instance, while national gains in overall readiness of care improved in Tanzania, geographic inequities persisted; in contrast, Senegal, and Kenya experienced stagnation in overall readiness at the national level, but disparities grew across subnational areas. Overall, providers adhered to about one-third of the clinical guidelines for managing sick-child illnesses at the national level. Yet across subnational units, such adherence greatly varied (e.g., 25% to 85% between counties of Kenya in 2020).
Our new approach enables identifies precise estimation of changes in the spatial distribution of healthcare quality metrics over time, at a a programmatic spatial resolution, and with accompanying uncertainty estimates. Use of our framework will provide new insights at a policy-relevant spatial resolution for national and regional decision-makers, and international funders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The DHS and World Bank Programs obtained ethical approvals for data collection and we obtained access to this data on DHS World Bank's websites (). Ethical approval for this type of secondary data analysis is not required by our institute.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Authors' affiliations updated and adding acknowledgment section
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
