Abstract
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) describes several procedures that involve injury to the vulva or vagina for nontherapeutic reasons. Though at least 200 million women and girls living in 30 countries have undergone FGM/C, there is a paucity of studies focused on public perception of FGM/C. We used machine learning methods to characterize discussion of FGM/C on Twitter in English from 2015 to 2020. Twitter has emerged in recent years as a source for seeking and sharing health information and misinformation. We extracted text metadata from user profiles to characterize the individuals and locations involved in conversations about FGM/C. We extracted major discussion themes from posts using correlated topic modeling. Finally, we extracted features from posts and applied random forest models to predict user engagement. The volume of tweets addressing FGM/C remained fairly stable across years. Conversation was mostly concentrated among the United States and United Kingdom through 2017, but shifted to Nigeria and Kenya in 2020. Some of the discussion topics associated with FGM/C across years included Islam, International Day of Zero Tolerance, current news stories, education, activism, male circumcision, human rights, and feminism. Tweet length and follower count were consistently strong predictors of engagement. Our findings suggest that (1) discussion about FGM/C has not evolved significantly over time, (2) the majority of the conversation about FGM/C on English-speaking Twitter is advocating for an end to the practice, (3) supporters of Donald Trump make up a substantial voice in the conversation about FGM/C, and (4) understanding the nuances in how people across cultures refer to and discuss FGM/C could be important for the design of public health communication and intervention.
Author Summary Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) refers to procedures that involve injury to the vulva and vagina for nontherapeutic reasons. At least 200 million women and girls living in 30 countries have undergone FGM/C. In many countries, there is not public perception research on FGM/C. When research is conducted, survey respondents may not answer truthfully about their opinions. We used Twitter data from 2015 to 2020 to better understand how the public thinks about FGM/C. We found that the conversation has generally stayed the same in this time period. Early in the study, users discussing FGM/C were mostly from the United States and United Kingdom, but later in the study, users were mostly from Nigeria and Kenya. Many people posted about stopping FGM/C, especially on the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation and using the hashtag #endfgm. Some people used FGM/C to justify Islamophobia and connected it with other practices like honor killings and acid attacks. We hope that this research can be used to inform communication about FGM/C in different countries to improve understanding about the practice and, design culturally effective campaigns to end FGM/C.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Boston University Medical Campus IRB provided approval for this research.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
We provide datasets containing tweet IDs for each of the six years in the dataset in a repository available here: https://github.com/graybabbs/fgmctwitter/ Original tweet text and user metadata reported in this study cannot be deposited in a public repository because of Twitter's data sharing policy. Tweet IDs can be used to retrieve original tweet data via Twitter’s public application programming interface (API).
