ABSTRACT
Background Protection from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines wanes over time and is compounded by emerging variants including Omicron subvariants. This study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines.
Methods This phase 2 open-label, randomized trial enrolled healthy adults previously vaccinated with a SARS-CoV-2 primary series and a single boost. Eligible participants were randomized to one of six Moderna COVID19 mRNA vaccine arms (50µg dose): Prototype (mRNA-1273), Omicron BA.1+Beta (1 or 2 doses), Omicron BA.1+Delta, Omicron BA.1 monovalent, and Omicron BA.1+Prototype. Neutralization antibody titers (ID50) were assessed for D614G, Delta, Beta and Omicron BA.1 variants and Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 subvariants 15 days after vaccination.
Results From March 30 to May 6, 2022, 597 participants were randomized and vaccinated. Median age was 53 years, and 20% had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. All vaccines were safe and well-tolerated. Day 15 geometric mean titers (GMT) against D614G were similar across arms and ages, and higher with prior infection. For uninfected participants, Day 15 Omicron BA.1 GMTs were similar across Omicron-containing vaccine arms (3724-4561) and higher than Prototype (1,997 [95%CI:1,482-2,692]). The Omicron BA.1 monovalent and Omicron BA.1+Prototype vaccines induced a geometric mean ratio (GMR) to Prototype for Omicron BA.1 of 2.03 (97.5%CI:1.37-3.00) and 1.56 (97.5%CI:1.06-2.31), respectively. A subset of samples from uninfected participants in four arms were also tested in a different laboratory at Day 15 for neutralizing antibody titers to D614G and Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2.12.2 and BA.4/BA.5. Omicron BA.4/BA.5 GMTs were approximately one third BA.1 GMTs (Prototype 517 [95%CI:324-826] vs. 1503 [95%CI:949-2381]; Omicron BA.1+Beta 628 [95%CI:367-1,074] vs. 2125 [95%CI:1139-3965]; Omicron BA.1+Delta 765 [95%CI:443-1,322] vs. 2242 [95%CI:1218-4128] and Omicron BA.1+Prototype 635 [95%CI:447-903] vs. 1972 [95%CI:1337-2907).
Conclusions Higher Omicron BA.1 titers were observed with Omicron-containing vaccines compared to Prototype vaccine and titers against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 were lower than against BA.1 for all candidate vaccines.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05289037
Competing Interest Statement
ARB has research grants from Pfizer, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme and CyanVac and serves on the DSMB board for AzurX Biopharma and has served as a consultant for Janssen. ARF has research grants from Pfizer, Janssen, CyanVac, Merck Sharp and Dohme and BioFire Diagnostics and serves on the DSMB for Novavax. EW has research grants from Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme and Pfizer and served on a DSMB sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. NGR has research grants from Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Merck Sharp and serves on the Safety Monitoring Committees for ICON and EMMES. DSG receives consulting fees from Critica, Inc a non-profit organization. LRB has received grant support from NIH for SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic and vaccine development work and is involved in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials conducted in collaboration with the NIH, Covid Prevention Network (CoVPN), Crucell/Janssen, Moderna, and Harvard Medical School. SRW has conducted clinical trials funded by Sanofi Pasteur, Janssen Vaccines, ModernaTx, and NIAID/NIH and chairs an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) for Janssen Vaccines. CMH is a member of a Safety Monitoring Committee for the Emmes Corporation. SJL has received research grant support to UCSD from Gilead Sciences. Her institution has also received funding from NIH to conduct clinical trials of Janssen and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. EJA has consulted for Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Janssen, GSK, Moderna, and Medscape, and his institution receives funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from MedImmune, Regeneron, PaxVax, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, Sanofi-Pasteur, Janssen, and Micron. He also serves on data and safety monitoring boards for Kentucky BioProcessing, Inc. and Sanofi Pasteur. He also serves on safety monitoring committees for WCG-ACI Clinical. His institution has also received funding from NIH to conduct clinical trials of Moderna and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines. The institution for SK has received funding from CDC to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript, from NIH to conduct clinical trials of Moderna and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines, and from Pfizer to conduct clinical trials of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The institution for CAR has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from BioFire Inc, GSK, MedImmune, Micron, Janssen, Merck, Novavax, PaxVax, Regeneron, Sanofi-Pasteur. She is co-inventor of patented RSV vaccine technology unrelated to this manuscript, which has been licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc. Her institution has received funds from NIH, Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen to conduct clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. EBW has served as an investigator for vaccine studies sponsored by Pfizer, Moderna and Sequiris. He has served on advisory boards for Vaxcyte and Iliad Biotechnologies. MJS has served as an investigator for vaccine studies sponsored by Pfizer, and has received investigator-initiated grants from Merck related to antimicrobial stewardship. RMN has received research grant funding from ModernaTX, Inc and Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. AW has received funding from NIH, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi and has been a consultant for Aicuris, X-Vax, Vir, Crozet, and Auritec. ACK reported clinical trials contract funding for vaccines or MAB vs SARS-CoV-2 with Regeneron and Pfizer. AFL has received research grant support to UCSF from Astra Zeneca. The Washington University Clinical Trials Unit has received unrelated funding support in sponsored research agreements from Moderna. PAG receives grant funding from the NIH and is a consultant for Johnson and Johnson.
Clinical Trial
NCT05289037
Funding Statement
The trial was sponsored and funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The trial was reviewed and approved by the Advarra central institutional review board which gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
