Abstract
Background The neurodevelopmental progress of infants below 3 months is globally not well described. A lack of published data on normative values of child development in this age group has been identified. In South Africa (SA), neurodevelopmental characteristics of infants at well-baby 6- and 10-week visits are omitted from the ‘Road to Health Booklet’, a nationally used patient-held clinical record. The neurodevelopmental status of infants in these age groups is not routinely monitored and data not documented. Important changes occur in the maturation of the central nervous system of infants at 6 weeks that mark this age as an important milestone for monitoring neurodevelopmental progress.
Methodology and findings A prospective longitudinal study was performed on a sample of 35 healthy term-born, infants from low-risk pregnancies at 6- and 10-weeks postnatal age in the Tshwane District, SA. The status of infants’ posture, tone, reflexes, movements, orientation and behaviour were recorded on the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE). Cut-off points on the 5th and 10th centiles, according to the HNNE ‘optimality scoring system’, were applied to the raw scores of the 34 items in the proforma evaluation form. This study quantitatively supports patterns of characteristic change occurring in muscle tone, posture, and visual behaviour of infants between 6 and 10 weeks.
Conclusion and significance This study recorded data on the neurodevelopmental assessment of infants from low-risk pregnancies at 6- and 10 weeks post-term age in Tshwane District, SA. The optimality scores obtained in this initial study in a low-middle-income country can guide health professionals using this method of examination during early neurodevelopmental screening at well-baby clinics. Further research is necessary to develop a SA norm for identifying the motor and neuro-behavioural characteristics of 6- and 10-week-old infants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria, South Africa, gave ethical approval for this work. Reference number 283/2019
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The title has changed as our article does not claim normative values based on this cohort of infants. Cut-off points were limited to the 5th and 10th centiles. The figures displaying the frequency distribution of raw scores were altered accordingly.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
