Abstract
We asked 97 current cigarette smokers to make 12 binary choices between experimental packages with varying warnings and background colors. Each participant had to decide which of the two packages contained cigarettes less risky for his health. Confronted with repugnant, threatening images, these smokers nonetheless made choices that were context independent, adhered to transitivity, and consistent with an additive utility model. Eye tracking measurements confirmed that the choices of 65 percent of participants were further compatible with a noise-reducing lexicographic utility model. This subset of participants smoked significantly more cigarettes per day. Our findings support a model in which addiction permits the smoker to suppress aversive stimuli and negative emotions that would otherwise interfere with short-term rational decision making.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Unión Contra la Tuberculosis y Enfermedades Respiratorias through an unrestricted grant to the Tobacco Control Program of the Ministry of Public Health of Uruguay.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Chemistry of the Universidad de la República, Uruguay.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
mariana.gerstenbluth{at}cienciassociales.edu.uy
patricia.triunfo{at}cienciassociales.edu.uy
Data Availability
All materials have been posted in the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/hr65z/.
