ABSTRACT
Objectives Neuropsychiatric presentations of monkeypox (MPX) infection have not been well characterised, Despite evidence of nervous system involvement associated with two related Orthopoxviruses, in the case of smallpox infection (with the variola virus) and smallpox vaccination (which contains live vaccinia virus). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to determine the prevalence and describe the spectrum of neurological and psychiatric presentations of MPX.
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis
Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED and pre-print server (MedRxiv) searched up to 31/05/2022
Eligibility criteria for study selection and analysis Any study design of humans infected with MPX that reported neurological or psychiatric presentation. Studies which included more than ten individuals, and symptoms that were reported in a minimum of two separate studies were eligible for meta-analysis
Data synthesis Results were pooled with random-effects meta-analysis to calculate generalised linear mixed models and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for each prevalence outcome.
Heterogeneity was measured with the I2 statistic. All included studies are summarised through a narrative synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute quality assessment tool.
Results From 1,702 unique studies, we extracted data on 19 eligible studies (1,512 participants, 1,031 with confirmed infection using CDC criteria or PCR testing) most of which were cohort studies and case series with no controlled populations. Study quality was generally moderate. Six clinical features were eligible for meta-analysis, of which the most prevalent were myalgia in 55.5% [95%CI 12.1-91.9%], headache 53.8% [30.6-75.4%], fatigue 36.2% [2.0-94.0%], seizure 2.7% [0.6-10.2%], confusion 2.4% [1.1-5.2%] and encephalitis 2.0% [0.5-8.2%]. Heterogeneity significantly varied across clinical features (I2=0%-98.7%). Other reported presentations not eligible for meta-analysis included sensory-perceptual disturbance (altered vision, dizziness, and photophobia) and psychiatric symptoms (anxiety and depression).
Conclusions There is preliminary evidence for a range of neurological and psychiatric presentations of MPX, ranging from commonly reported and nonspecific neurological symptoms (myalgia and headache) to rarer but more severe neurological complications, such as encephalitis and seizures. There is less evidence regarding the psychiatric sequelae of MPX, and although there are multiple reports of anxiety and depression the prevalence of these symptoms is unknown. MPX-related nervous system presentations may warrant surveillance within the current MPX outbreak, with prospective longitudinal studies evaluating the mid to long-term sequelae of the virus. Robust methods to evaluate the potential causality of MPX with these clinical features are required at an individual and epidemiological level.
Systematic review registration PROSPERO ID 336649
What is already known on this topic
Neuropsychiatric symptoms can be highly disabling and have a detrimental effect on quality of life.
Neuropsychiatric manifestations of monkeypox virus infection have not been well characterised, however, there is evidence of nervous system involvement with the related smallpox virus and vaccinia vaccine.
What this study adds
Preliminary evidence for a range of neurological and psychiatric presentations of monkeypox infection, ranging from commonly reported and nonspecific neurological symptoms (myalgia and headache) to rarer but more severe neurological complications, such as encephalitis and seizures.
There is less evidence regarding the psychiatric sequelae of monkeypox infection, and although there are multiple reports of anxiety and depression the prevalence of these symptoms is unknown.
This preliminary suspicion that there are monkeypox-related nervous system manifestations may warrant both surveillance within the current monkeypox outbreak and robust methods to evaluate the potential causality.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed ICMJE uniform disclosure forms and declare; GL is supported by the UCLH BRC, is funded by NIHR, and is TSC chair for NIHR study. CW receives support from the Royal College of Psychiatrists Pathfinder Fellowship and the Association of British Neurologists' Bursary. AE is a recipient of various grants for The Encephalitis Society which she is chief executive of, she has received payment for speaking and presentations from Pfizer, UCB, Bavarian Nordics, Valneva, CSL Behring and Biomerieux. MZ was supported to attend the European Academy of Neurology 2022 Encephalitis Workshop. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=336649
Funding Statement
MSZ, GL, ASD and CFH were supported by the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. BDM is supported by the UKRI/MRC (MR/V03605X/1), the MRC-CSF (MR/V007181/1), the MRC/AMED (MR/T028750/1) and the Wellcome Trust (102186/B/13/Z). TAP is supported by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship. JPR is supported by the Wellcome Trust (102186/B/13/Z). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint first authors
↵⍰ Joint last authors
jamiebadenoch{at}gmail.com, iconti02{at}qub.ac.uk, emmarachelrengasamy{at}gmail.com, cameron.watson{at}qmul.ac.uk, matthew.butler{at}kcl.ac.uk, zhuss95{at}gmail.com, Ally.Rooney{at}ed.ac.uk, Benedict.Michael{at}liverpool.ac.uk, m.zandi{at}ucl.ac.uk, glyn.lewis{at}ucl.ac.uk, anthony.s.david{at}ucl.ac.uk, c.houlihan{at}ucl.ac.uk, ava{at}encephalitis.info, kuppallik{at}who.int, timothy.nicholson{at}kcl.ac.uk, thomas.pollak{at}kcl.ac.uk, jonathan.rogers{at}ucl.ac.uk
Author's name typo
Data Availability
The code created and used for the meta-analysis is available on GitHub (link included)
https://github.com/CameronWatson2020/monkeypox/blob/main/monkeypox_analysis.R