Abstract
Background Bolus tracking can optimize the time delay between contrast injection and diagnostic scan initiation in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), yet the procedure is time-consuming and subject to inter- and intra-operator variances which affect the enhancement levels in diagnostic scans. The objective of the current study is to use artificial intelligence algorithms to fully automate the bolus tracking procedure in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT exams for improved standardization and diagnostic accuracy while providing a simplified imaging workflow.
Methods This retrospective study used abdominal CT exams collected under a dedicated IRB. Input data consisted of CT topograms and images with high heterogeneity in terms of anatomy, sex, cancer pathologies, and imaging artifacts acquired with four different CT scanner models. Our method consisted of two sequential steps: (i) automatic locator scan positioning on topograms, and (ii) automatic ROI positioning within the aorta on locator scans. The task of locator scan positioning is formulated as a regression problem, where the limited amount of annotated data is circumvented using transfer learning. The task of ROI positioning is formulated as a segmentation problem.
Results Our locator scan positioning network offered improved positional consistency compared to a high degree of variance in manual slice positionings, verifying inter-operator variance as a significant source of error. When trained using expert-user ground truth labels, the locator scan positioning network achieved a sub-centimeter error (9.76 ± 6.78 mm) on a test dataset. The ROI segmentation network achieved a sub-millimeter absolute error (0.99 ± 0.66 mm) on a test dataset.
Conclusions Locator scan positioning networks offer improved positional consistency compared to manual slice positionings and verified inter-operator variance as an important source of error. By significantly reducing operator-related decisions, this method opens opportunities to standardize and simplify the workflow of bolus tracking procedures for contrast-enhanced CT.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. PN receives research grant funding from Philips Healthcare and Siemens Medical Solutions USA. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of University of Pennsylvania gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
