Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been widely adopted as a tool for measuring common variant liability and it has been shown to predict lifetime risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) development. However, the relationship between PRS and AD pathogenesis is largely unknown. We aimed to address some of the knowledge gaps with respect to the downstream molecular consequences associated with PRS. We also make a direct comparison of the disrupted biological mechanisms in a case/control classification and in response to PRS in the same individuals.
We performed an integrative computational analysis of the transcriptome of the largest human brain-derived cohort sample (288 individuals; cerebellum and temporal cortex; MayoRNAseq; AMP-AD) with matched AD genetic and gene-expression data (WGS; bulk-brain RNA-seq). There was little overlap in terms of differentially expressed genes in case/control and PRS analyses, but a consensus of commonly disrupted biological mechanisms. Genes implicated by previous AD GWAS were found to be significantly enriched with respect to PRS in temporal cortex only. We identified mechanisms that were previously implicated in AD, including immune/stress response, lipid/cholesterol/fatty acid metabolism, endosome, death/apoptosis, neuronal processes, ageing and the involvement of glial cells. We also provide novel evidence for the significant involvement in AD of cellular structures, including the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum as well as mitochondrial function.
The largely common biological mechanisms between a case/control classification and in association with PRS suggests that PRS stratification can be used for studies where suitable case/control samples are not available or the selection of individuals with high and low PRS in clinical trials.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The project is funded by Ser Cymru Rising Star fellowship awarded to Dr Dobril Ivanov by the European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government (CU-147; Dr Dobril Ivanov and Dr Benoit Lan-Leung). Karen Crawford was supported by MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics (MR/L010305/1). Dr Ganna Leonenko and Emily Baker were supported by the Dementia Research Institute [UKDRI supported by the Medical Research Council (UKDRI-3003), Alzheimers Research UK, and Alzheimers Society. We would like to express our gratitude to the Advanced Research Computing at Cardiff University (ARCCA) for the computational support. We thank Joint Programming for Neurodegeneration (MRC: MR/T04604X/1), Dementia Platforms UK (MRC: MR/L023784/2)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author affiliations updated; Fig. 5 updated
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
