ABSTRACT
Purpose Gait parameters are altered and asymmetrical in individual with transtibial amputation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of four different prosthetic feet on lower-limb biomechanics during gait.
Methods One young adult with transtibial ampution performed four gait analysis sessions with four foot-ankle prosthesis (Variflex, Meridium, Echelon, Kinterra). Kinematic, kinetic parameters and gait symmetry were analyzed during different prosthesis conditions.
Results The type of prosthesis had little effect on amputee’ spatiotemporal parameters. Throughout the stance phase, an increase hip angle and a reduced knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion were observed in the amputated leg. For kinetic parameters, a reduced propulsive force (SI=0.42–0.65), reduced knee extension moment (mainly during Echelon and Kinterra conditions, SI=0.17 and 0.32, respectively) and an increased knee abduction moment (mainly during the Variflex and Meridium, SI=5.74 and 8.93, respectively) in the amputated leg. Lower support moments were observed in the amputated leg compared to the unaffected leg, regardless of the type of prosthesis (SI=0.61–0.80).
Conclusions The prostheses tested induced different lower-limb mechanical adaptations. If better gait symmetry between lower limbs is one of the clinical goals, an objective gait analysis could help clinicians to prescribe prosthetic feet based on quantitative measurement indicators.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
none
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Quebec Institute of Rehabilitation in Physical Deficiency research ethical committee(2016-489)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos