Abstract
Objectives To examine the mental wellbeing of prison staff in England within the pandemic, and determine factors associated with wellbeing.
Design Cross-sectional study, with self-completed hardcopy and online surveys.
Setting 26 prisons across England, chosen to be representative of the wider closed prison estate in England
Participants All staff within the 26 prisons from 20th July 2020 and 2nd October 2020 were eligible.
Primary outcome measure Wellbeing, measured using the Short-version of Warwick-Edinburgh Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Staff wellbeing was compared to that of the English population using indirectly standardised data from the Health Survey for England 2010-13 and a one-sample t-test. Multivariate linear regression modelling explored associations with mental wellbeing score.
Results 2534 individuals were included (response rate 22.2%). The mean age was 44 years, 53% were female, and 93% were white. The sample mean SWEMWBS score was 23.84 and the standardised population mean score was 23.57. The difference in means was statistically significant (95% CI 0.09 to 0.46), but not of at a clinically meaningful level. The multivariate linear regression model was adjusted for age category, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, presence of comorbidities, occupation, and HMPPS region. Higher wellbeing was significantly associated with older age, male sex, Black/Black British ethnicity, never having smoked, working within the health staff team, and working in certain prison regions. The overall model had a low predictive value (adjusted R2 = 0.0345).
Conclusions Unexpectedly, prison staff wellbeing as measured by SWEMWBS was similar to that of the general population. Reasons for this are unclear but could include the reduction in violence within prisons since the start of the pandemic. Qualitative research across a diverse sample of prison settings would enrich understanding of staff wellbeing within the pandemic.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This is the largest study to date to explore the mental wellbeing of prison staff in the UK (n=2534) and the first peer-reviewed study examining this during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The sampling frame used (all staff at 26 prisons in England) is more likely to be representative of the prison staff population than other studies which have measured prison staff wellbeing and recruited through trade union channels
Wellbeing was measured using SWEMWBS, which has been validated within the UK population
Response rate was low (22.2%) and a number of variables adjusted for in the regression model were self-reported which could lead to a degree of bias
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/1/e30749
Funding Statement
The main funder for this study is the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), UK Government. The Ministry of Justice, the Office for National Statistics, Public Health England and the University of Southampton provided in-kind support for the study. DHSC had no role in the development of the design of the study nor in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Colleagues from DHSC were instrumental in operationalising the testing that was a key part of the study design. N. McGrath is a recipient of an NIHR Research Professorship award (Ref: RP-2017-08-ST2-008). All authors had full access to the data and final responsibility to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by the University of Southampton (ERGO ID 57844) and the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS project ID: 285534; REC reference: 20/NW/0320).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email addresses Luke Johnson l.johnson{at}soton.ac.uk
Maciej Czachorowski maciej.czachorowski{at}phe.gov.uk
Kerry Gutridge kerry.gutridge{at}manchester.ac.uk
Nuala McGrath n.mcgrath{at}soton.ac.uk
Julie Parkes jules{at}soton.ac.uk
Emma Plugge e.plugge{at}soton.ac.uk
Data Availability
The dataset used in this study is held securely on encrypted servers at the University of Southampton and all data is managed in accordance with the CiPS Privacy Notice and study protocol, as well as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) guidelines. The safeguarding of participant confidentiality is of utmost importance and therefore any requests for data will be judged on a case-by-case basis by all relevant stakeholders. All shared data would be deidentified. For all requests regarding data, please contact the corresponding author.
