Abstract
Neuroimaging studies of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) consistently find an aberrant pattern of “reduced” laterality in brain networks that support functions related to social communication and language. However, it is unclear how the underlying functional organization of these brain networks is altered in ASD individuals. We tested four models of “reduced” laterality in a social-communication network in seventy ASD individuals (14 females) and a control group of the same number of tightly matched typically developing (TD) individuals (19 females) using high quality resting-state fMRI data and a method of measuring patterns of functional laterality across the brain. We found that a functionally defined social-communication network exhibited the typical pattern of left laterality in both groups, while there was a significant increase in laterality of homotopic regions in the right hemisphere in ASD individuals. Furthermore, left laterality was positively correlated with a measure of verbal ability in both groups, while right laterality in ASD, but not TD, individuals was negatively correlated with the same verbal measure. Crucially, these differences in patterns of laterality were not found in two other functional networks and were specifically correlated to a measure of verbal, but not visuospatial, ability. These results suggest that previous reports of “reduced” laterality in social-communication regions in ASD is due to a shift towards functional decoupling of the two hemispheres, which may cause them to act as independent systems with the atypical right-lateralized network being maladaptive.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the NIMH Intramural Research Program. (#ZIA MH002920-09, clinical trials number NCT01031407).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of National Institute of Mental Health gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, The University of Edinburgh, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos