Abstract
Background Higher BMI in childhood is associated with lower academic achievement.
Objective To explore potential pathways linking childhood BMI with educational attainment.
Methods In the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children prospective cohort study (N=6234), we used structural equation models to assess the association between BMI z-scores at 11.7 years and educational attainment at 16 (General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) results). Depressive symptoms, externalising symptoms, bullying, pressure to lose weight, and school enjoyment were considered as potential mediators.
Results Higher BMI z-scores were associated with lower GCSE scores (total effect: females β = -3.20 95% CI -5.15, -1.26; males β = -2.98 95% CI -5.12, -0.84). Depressive symptoms and externalising symptoms partially mediated this association in females (indirect effect: β = -0.35 95% CI -0.63, -0.06, proportion mediated = 11%; β = -0.84 95% CI -1.77, 0.10, proportion mediated = 26%, respectively). In males, there was some evidence that the association was partially mediated by bullying (indirect effect β = -0.35 95% CI -0.74, 0.03, proportion mediated = 12%).
Conclusions The association between childhood BMI and educational attainment may be partially mediated by depressive symptoms and externalising symptoms in females, and by bullying in males.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Howe reports grants from Health Foundation, grants from UK Medical Research Council, during the conduct of the study.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Health Foundation as part of their Social and Economic Value of Health programme. The Health Foundation is an independent charity committed to bringing about better health and health care for people in the UK. Laura D Howe is supported by a Career Development Award from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/M020894/1). Tim Cadman received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 733206, LIFE-CYCLE project. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the local research ethics committees
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data concerns individual human subjects and therefore is not freely available, but can be obtained by researchers by applying to ALSPAC.
