Abstract
Objectives The stringent adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as lockdowns, social distancing and use of face covering was seen during the COVID-19 pandemic in different settings worldwide including the United Kingdom Armed Forces (UKAF). This study assessed the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions targeted at the COVID-19 pandemic on influenza reported cases in the UKAF.
Methods A longitudinal study design was used, and secondary data obtained from the UKAF Defence Medical Information Capability Programme was analysed retrospectively. Data on influenza cases pre COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared. The data was entered into IBM SPSS version 27 and analysis included both descriptive and inferential statistics with a statistically significant p-value of <0.05.
Results The influenza seasons pre COVID-19 pandemic (2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 – N = 8 for each season) were associated with larger number of flu cases, M = 526.00 (SD = 343.860), M = 393.25 (SD = 248.529) and M = 563.50 (SD = 309.591) respectively. By comparison, the influenza season during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-21 – N = 8) was associated with a numerically smaller number of influenza cases, M = 95.38 (SD = 70.561). An independent samples t-test was performed to test the hypothesis that influenza cases pre COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with statistically significant different means. Levene’s F test showed heterogeneity of variance when the influenza cases were compared. The independent sample t-test was associated with a statistically significant effect with a large effect size as shown by the Cohen’s d estimates.
Conclusions The results indicate that the total number of Influenza cases reported within UKAF after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower than the number of cases reported in influenza seasons pre COVID-19 pandemic. Further research will be useful in exploring how individual NPI impacts influenza activity in the UKAF to support the recommendation of effective NPI combinations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from Leeds Beckett University in line with its ethics policy and procedures. Further consent was obtained from the UKAF where secondary data was sourced for the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
