Follow this preprint
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development and validation of QCancer2 (10-year risk) lung model and evaluating the model performance of nine prediction models
View ORCID ProfileWeiqi Liao, Carol Coupland, Judith Burchardt, David Baldwin, the DART initiative, Fergus Gleeson, Julia Hippisley-Cox
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.04.22275868
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Weiqi Liao
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Data Scientist
Carol Coupland
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Roles: Senior Research Fellow, Professor of Medical Statistics in Primary Care
Judith Burchardt
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
GPRoles: Honorary Clinical Researcher
David Baldwin
3Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
2School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Roles: Consultant Respiratory Physician, Honorary Professor of Medicine
Fergus Gleeson
4Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Consultant Radiologist and Professor of Radiology
Julia Hippisley-Cox
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Roles: Professor of Clinical Epidemiology and General Practice

Posted June 06, 2022.
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development and validation of QCancer2 (10-year risk) lung model and evaluating the model performance of nine prediction models
Weiqi Liao, Carol Coupland, Judith Burchardt, David Baldwin, the DART initiative, Fergus Gleeson, Julia Hippisley-Cox
medRxiv 2022.06.04.22275868; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.04.22275868
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
0
Author Videos
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (420)
- Allergy and Immunology (744)
- Anesthesia (217)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (3208)
- Dermatology (270)
- Emergency Medicine (476)
- Epidemiology (13211)
- Forensic Medicine (19)
- Gastroenterology (887)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5039)
- Geriatric Medicine (469)
- Health Economics (770)
- Health Informatics (3167)
- Health Policy (1121)
- Hematology (419)
- HIV/AIDS (997)
- Medical Education (467)
- Medical Ethics (125)
- Nephrology (512)
- Neurology (4783)
- Nursing (253)
- Nutrition (708)
- Oncology (2462)
- Ophthalmology (698)
- Orthopedics (277)
- Otolaryngology (336)
- Pain Medicine (318)
- Palliative Medicine (89)
- Pathology (528)
- Pediatrics (1272)
- Primary Care Research (546)
- Public and Global Health (7343)
- Radiology and Imaging (1661)
- Respiratory Medicine (962)
- Rheumatology (471)
- Sports Medicine (413)
- Surgery (532)
- Toxicology (69)
- Transplantation (227)
- Urology (199)